Peer reviewed. Shows blood abnormalities in 80+-% of those vaccinated.
Posted that to another board yesterday and was literally called a science denier. I’m showing you the science and you’re denying it’s real. Who’s the denier?
Might as well lock the thread, the pandemic is over...potatoJoe said so:
All hail the experts!But... HoRsEpAsTe!
Why would you study it if you cannot make any money from it?They keep saying a study needs to be performed, but they won't actually perform one.
Exactly! Most of those early studies say a study needs to be done to look specifically at that but it never happens. There has been plenty of time.They keep saying a study needs to be performed, but they won't actually perform one.
Exactly. Why do you think they refuse to fund research into medical uses for marijuana?Exactly! Most of those early studies say a study needs to be done to look specifically at that but it never happens. There has been plenty of time.
Most of the funding for medical research comes from NIH and big pharma. NIH will not fund a study to look into Ivermectin because of fauci and big pharma won't fund it because it doesn't do anything for them.
There is, however, a glaring omission from the media’s portrayal of Anderson as brave truth speaker. None of the fact checks or news stories disclose that her name has appeared on multiple grants for projects aiming to manipulate coronaviruses, including a National Institutes of Health award to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, and a grant that was rejected by the U.S. military research agency DARPA, in part for risky gain of function research.