The trials aren't completed. The tests aren't completed. Untested. Unapproved.Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hold on right there. Holy Goalpost-Moving, Batman!
You didn't say, "unapproved and trials not done." You said, "untested."
(By the way, a bit of insider information. Initial market release is unofficially considered the phase-four clinical trial. Because no matter how wide-spread the Phase 3 trial, it's not really known how a drug will impact the market at-large until market release. That's why pharmacovigilance is part of market authorization - just as heightened pharmacovigilance is part of EUA.)
That's not how this works. The basic, biological understanding of mRNA is just as I described. It doesn't go back into the nucleus. For you to claim otherwise puts the burden of proof on you, not on me, to prove how mRNA gets back into the nucleus.
You might as well be asking me to prove that fecal matter doesn't move backward through the digestive track and into the stomach - or to prove how a differentiated cell can't convert itself back into a stem cell.
How many more times do you want to play word games? Don't bother answering because I won't.
For the next semantic antic, no. I'm not buying that zero is valid. And there's no point in you arguing zero based upon how the mechanisms are supposed to work. Thinking about it, us even having the conversation is goofy because we actually don't know what has been synthesized in vaccines' production, the synthetic mRNA bits in the vaccines being how this downhill slide began.
Hope you enjoyed this. I've been polite. I've been answering you for the sake of politeness but now, no.
No more.