Beer Virus V

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Not something I've seen, either; but then, outside of my parents, I don't have a lot of people in my circle who would generally bring up shingles in casual conversation.

    I only know a little bit about shingles, but isn't it a delayed viral response, or some sort of delayed immune/autoimmune response from chicken pox? Perhaps something with the action of a virus (i.e. creating an immune response) could trigger something that has to do with the shingles pathway? I don't know; just spit-balling.

    Vaccines, as with therapeutic drug products, get associated with all manner of side effects. Every single one of them. Some are related, but rare and/or mild enough that they are acceptable. Some are merely correlated (i.e. unrelated to the drug product but were observed during a trial or reported through pharmacovigilance, and are thus included in the adverse event reporting database). Some are frequent and/or severe enough to warrant discontinuing the drug investigation and/or approval process.

    So, it honestly never surprises me when someone says, "side effect X was reported for drug Y."
    Yeah, that's all fair.

    And yeah, shingles is basically the chickenpox virus dormant until... well... until it isn't dormant anymore. I knew from before that it can be triggered by stress, other immuno-issues, or sometimes without a specific trigger at all. Apparently it is quite painful, though, so that particular vaccine is moving up in priority for me.

    Thanks!
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,294
    113
    Martinsville
    This is the first I've heard of anyone mentioning shingles in relation to a covid vaccine.

    I've heard of just about every other possible nightmare resulting from the astra zeneca vaccine, but never shingles.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    This is the first I've heard of anyone mentioning shingles in relation to a covid vaccine.

    I've heard of just about every other possible nightmare resulting from the astra zeneca vaccine, but never shingles.
    For reference, back in February it was going around reddit to the point that some medical people felt like they should address it. Sorry, it doesn't look like it was the CDC, though.

    (One might argue that it takes the CDC months to do anything, but that may be like kicking a .gov agency when they're down at this point.)

     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    For reference, back in February it was going around reddit to the point that some medical people felt like they should address it. Sorry, it doesn't look like it was the CDC, though.

    (One might argue that it takes the CDC months to do anything, but that may be like kicking a .gov agency when they're down at this point.)


    But those comments were from "experts" - which means we now need to know what kind of "experts" they are. Are they phony "experts", political "experts", agenda driven "experts", lying "experts" or normal "experts"? Only then can we even think about trusting the words of "experts".
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    112,848
    149
    Southside Indy
    Yeah, that's all fair.

    And yeah, shingles is basically the chickenpox virus dormant until... well... until it isn't dormant anymore. I knew from before that it can be triggered by stress, other immuno-issues, or sometimes without a specific trigger at all. Apparently it is quite painful, though, so that particular vaccine is moving up in priority for me.

    Thanks!
    I suppose it's reasonable to suspect that the additional stress from the lockdowns, isolation, etc. could cause an increase in shingles. Not really a result of the vaccinations though.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    I suppose it's reasonable to suspect that the additional stress from the lockdowns, isolation, etc. could cause an increase in shingles. Not really a result of the vaccinations though.
    Yeah - and again, this is purely anecdotal, it seems strange to see the uptick *after* getting vaccinated. That is, at that point, people should feel less stress.

    If there is a correlation, it seems to me that it is one immunity-system-effecting modality (the vaccine) triggering an unintended immunity-system response (shingles). There really aren't that many vaccines (that I know of) intended for those of us later in life (shingles being one), and having tens of millions of people in that demographic vaccinated is unprecedented.

    So, if there is a correlation, I expect it to be general, rather than specific to COVID. But, since this mRNA mass production stuff is still relatively new (correct me if I'm wrong on that, chip) it does weird me out a bit to think about.

    Take that, science!
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,294
    113
    Martinsville
    Yeah - and again, this is purely anecdotal, it seems strange to see the uptick *after* getting vaccinated. That is, at that point, people should feel less stress.

    I don't know man, taking a vaccine that is lacking about 2 years worth of standard safety testing is probably a pretty wild ride.

    I wouldn't take it but the ones using the newest technology, like the mRNA ones, seem to be the least problematic.
     

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    The sheets you linked do NOT say that "trials haven't been performed..." They simply don't say that. In fact, they say exactly the opposite.

    On mRNA: again, it's basic biology. I don't have to prove "zero". You have to prove "non-zero".

    And, yes; using mRNA to turn on/off gene expression is exactly why I said that it is more epigenetic than genetic therapy.
    The sheet says they are unapproved and the trials are ongoing. That's unapproved and trials not done. You know, something I haven't bothered to check on are updated sheets. I'm not really interested at this point in time. If and when I am forced to take the jab in order to engage in commerce and society as is being implemented in some areas of the world, then I will be very interested. Today over lunch we were discussing this part of our world and when I said that at some point it is likely that I will have to take the jabs in order to be able to provide for her, to take care of her, she smiled and said she had the same thoughts about taking care of me. She's a good one.

    As regards your claim that I have to prove non-zero...
    Why, because you said so? Really? You have no data to prove what you started this with, the claim of zero. A claim that I do not see as justifiable.

    Chip, this is getting to be a little ridiculous.
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    What do they call the shingles shot in a med record? I have one listing for HZV in 2010 - is that for shingles? Do you need to get that shot every so many years or is it one and done?
     

    oze

    Mow Ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 26, 2018
    3,358
    113
    Fort Wayne
    I've had the first of two of both the covid and shingles shots. The shingles shot hurt a lot more than the Covid shot. Orders of magnitude more. And the shingles injection site pain lasted for days, as opposed to a couple of hours with covid.

    Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    The sheet says they are unapproved and the trials are ongoing. That's unapproved and trials not done. You know, something I haven't bothered to check on are updated sheets. I'm not really interested at this point in time. If and when I am forced to take the jab in order to engage in commerce and society as is being implemented in some areas of the world, then I will be very interested. Today over lunch we were discussing this part of our world and when I said that at some point it is likely that I will have to take the jabs in order to be able to provide for her, to take care of her, she smiled and said she had the same thoughts about taking care of me. She's a good one.

    Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hold on right there. Holy Goalpost-Moving, Batman!

    You didn't say, "unapproved and trials not done." You said, "untested."

    (By the way, a bit of insider information. Initial market release is unofficially considered the phase-four clinical trial. Because no matter how wide-spread the Phase 3 trial, it's not really known how a drug will impact the market at-large until market release. That's why pharmacovigilance is part of market authorization - just as heightened pharmacovigilance is part of EUA.)

    As regards your claim that I have to prove non-zero...
    Why, because you said so? Really? You have no data to prove what you started this with, the claim of zero. A claim that I do not see as justifiable.

    Chip, this is getting to be a little ridiculous.

    That's not how this works. The basic, biological understanding of mRNA is just as I described. It doesn't go back into the nucleus. For you to claim otherwise puts the burden of proof on you, not on me, to prove how mRNA gets back into the nucleus.

    You might as well be asking me to prove that fecal matter doesn't move backward through the digestive track and into the stomach - or to prove how a differentiated cell can't convert itself back into a stem cell.
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hold on right there. Holy Goalpost-Moving, Batman!

    You didn't say, "unapproved and trials not done." You said, "untested."

    (By the way, a bit of insider information. Initial market release is unofficially considered the phase-four clinical trial. Because no matter how wide-spread the Phase 3 trial, it's not really known how a drug will impact the market at-large until market release. That's why pharmacovigilance is part of market authorization - just as heightened pharmacovigilance is part of EUA.)



    That's not how this works. The basic, biological understanding of mRNA is just as I described. It doesn't go back into the nucleus. For you to claim otherwise puts the burden of proof on you, not on me, to prove how mRNA gets back into the nucleus.

    You might as well be asking me to prove that fecal matter doesn't move backward through the digestive track and into the stomach
    - or to prove how a differentiated cell can't convert itself back into a stem cell.
    That's true, I saw it on South Park.
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    This is the fourth day after COVID shot number two and the swelling in my deltoid has finally gone down a lot, barely there.
    This was the longest lasting swelling I have ever had - including the shingles shot which didn't bother me at all. There is a lot of individual variance in this stuff.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Just an observation...

    Screenshot_20210330-155250_Epoch Times.jpg


    1.jpg

    These men would be Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, and Dick van Dyke, respectively. At this point I believe I would have more confidence in medical advice from van Dyke.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom