Beer Virus V

[bobzilla]

It’s getting harder and harder to take some people seriously. Why is there no talk of the Obama variant? Not a single mask at his party. “Oh. But they were vaccinated” Ya, that’s why that county is reporting the largest increase of Covid 19 since the beginning, right? Let’s focus on governors who support people’s freedom to make their own choice, let’s ignore the politicians caught numerous times not following their own rules.

Show me where Texas and Florida is at on the Covid death count this month, then talk statistics. As long as people who tell me to where a mask aren’t doing so themselves, and as long as the hospitals are still full of vaccinated patients, I’m not doing ****. Don’t like it? Scream outside as loud as you can, someone might care, but I don’t.

all of this

 

[NKBJ]

How can a mask or a jab keep you safe from an outbreak of IMF and the WEF variant ?

 

[rooster]

In Australia, “ good for thee but not for me” seems to be the order of the day. Government officials caught traveling while locking down the country
Edit: this is from may but in light of recent lockdown debate and discussion of the Obama bday party I think it’s relevant

NSW deputy premier spent weekend 'on the farm' despite telling public not to travel

John Barilaro says travelling to second property 125km away did not breach lockdown rules

www.theguardian.com

 

[Hatin Since 87]

I invited a guy from work to a party at my place Sunday. Cooking brisket and pulled pork, told him to swing by but make sure he brings a mask. He said “you’re making people wear mask?” I said hell no, it’s not about the virus, it’s just for you cause I don’t wanna see your ugly face

 

[Hatin Since 87]

In Australia, “ good for thee but not for me” seems to be the order of the day. Government officials caught traveling while locking down the country
Edit: this is from may but in light of recent lockdown debate and discussion of the Obama bday party I think it’s relevant

NSW deputy premier spent weekend 'on the farm' despite telling public not to travel

John Barilaro says travelling to second property 125km away did not breach lockdown rules

www.theguardian.com

Same **** different toilet.

 

[Timjoebillybob]

You are incorrect, which is getting to be unsurprising. I am criticizing the already long laundry list of special people who are somewhat immune from arbitrary discrimination and simultaneously lamenting that the only way to PREVENT arbitrary discrimination seems to be to add to that list rather than see people mount a robust defense of all freedoms

You don't have total freedom of association and you know it, and your pastel worries about the unvaccinated being made a protected class is given the lie when contrasted with your desire to make the vaccinated a protected class

Maybe the best way forward is not to make any new protected classes, and perhaps rethink some of the already existing ones. The willingness of some to bend and twist rights for the purpose of merely getting what they want at the moment alway leaves me SMH

I see '... Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness ...' but I don't believe 'safety' is ever mentioned

Please correct me if I'm wrong, are you not advocating that businesses should not be able to refuse service if someone is unvaccinated? If I'm right, how is that not making them a protected class?

I'll agree that a busness owners right to associate or not with who they wish is being infringed. I never said it wasn't.

Where have I stated or implied I wish to make the vaccinated a protected class? I'm all for the couple of businesses that have stated that the vaccinated aren't welcome. Their property, their rules.

I don't have problem one with getting rid of all protected classes.

 

[BugI02]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, are you not advocating that businesses should not be able to refuse service if someone is unvaccinated? If I'm right, how is that not making them a protected class?

[THIS ^^^ is just the other side of the coin you espouse below. How is allowing discrimination of vaccinated/unvaccinated NOT making the vaccinated a de facto protected class. The only difference is in the second case the businesses are doing something you approve of, so ... FREEDOM!]

Where have I stated or implied I wish to make the vaccinated a protected class? I'm all for the couple of businesses that have stated that the vaccinated aren't welcome. Their property, their rules.

I don't have problem one with getting rid of all protected classes.

Edit: Spare me the canard that this is in any way equivalent 'no shirt, no shoes, no service', you are supporting discrimination against people for freely making the choice they feel is best for their physical health and well being, for how they choose to live their lives

 

[rhamersley]

New Zealand To Sink Entire Country Into The Sea To Stop Single Case Of COVID

WELLINGTON, NZ—After discovering a single case of COVID on the island of New Zealand, the country's Prime Minister and Chief Muppet Jacinda Ardern has decided she will take no chances—electing to just sink the entire island into the sea to stop the spread.

babylonbee.com

 

[rooster]

This is hard to watch. Taking peoples kids in Australia to force vaccination

TikTok - Make Your Day

vm.tiktok.com

 

[BugI02]

What the **** happened to the Aussies?

 

[printcraft]

This is hard to watch. Taking peoples kids in Australia to force vaccination

TikTok - Make Your Day

vm.tiktok.com

The people that ordered it and the ones carrying it out and enforcing it.
They are the enemy.

 

[Timjoebillybob]

[THIS ^^^ is just the other side of the coin you espouse below. How is allowing discrimination of vaccinated/unvaccinated NOT making the vaccinated a de facto protected class. The only difference is in the second case the businesses are doing something you approve of, so ... FREEDOM!]


Edit: Spare me the canard that this is in any way equivalent 'no shirt, no shoes, no service', you are supporting discrimination against people for freely making the choice they feel is best for their physical health and well being, for how they choose to live their lives

Who said I approve of it? I stated I'm all for them being able to prohibit who they wish. If a business doesn't want x patronizing them, I'm all for their ability to disallow them to. Whether I approve of their choice is a different matter.

And just how in the hell is saying a business should be able to prohibit vaccinated or unvaccinated making the vaccinated a protected class?

I support peoples rights, even if I disagree with how they exercise them. Case in point, I support peoples right to open carry. I even do so myself. I even support these jackwads right to do so. I may not agree with how they did it, but that's a different story. I also support the businesses right to say no carry which they did after this.

You and everybody else is free to make the choice you feel is best, whether that is taking the jab or not. I really don't care.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

What the **** happened to the Aussies?

Cowards rolled over and gave up their firearms “for safety”. Now they gotta give up their kids “for safety”.

 

[d.kaufman]

This is hard to watch. Taking peoples kids in Australia to force vaccination

TikTok - Make Your Day

vm.tiktok.com

That won't end good for anyone if they try that **** here!

 

[Hatin Since 87]

That won't end good for anyone if they try that **** here!

I like to think so too, but I’ve been surprised the last 2 years at what people are willing to allow.

 

[Tombs]

It's a severe form of government intervention to prevent businesses from deciding what customers should come in. He's also forbidden school mask mandates, hasn't he?

First, that's a different topic but it should be up to the business owner. However, I would not support such a business.

And no, it's not at all the same as trying to minimize infectious disease spread. Abbott's anti-masking stance and preventing others from asking about vaccines is aiding infectious disease. It's not rationalized by saying "oh but racism". The vaccine is free and it's a choice, not something people were born with.

Plenty of people have medical conditions that make the vaccine more risky, that they didn't chose to have.
Lots of pregnant mothers have significant reason to avoid the vaccine.

Not to mention people who simply don't think the vaccine is safe, and aren't going to risk their life over a 99.9% chance of survival.

A store discriminating against such people is equal to racism or worse.

 

[d.kaufman]

I like to think so too, but I’ve been surprised the last 2 years at what people are willing to allow.

I'm more speaking for myself, cause yes this country is full of sheep that will follow the leader at all costs.

 

[Hawkeye]

What the **** happened to the Aussies?

Well, they did start out as prison deportees...

 

[rooster]

What an odd situation we find ourselves in. 10 years ago if you asked any college liberal

“ if a business discriminates against someone that isn’t a legally protected group yet does that make it ok?”

they would have went raving on about how discrimination is discrimination.

now here we stand in 2020 with liberals calling for discrimination and conservatives still haven’t figured out they were on the wrong side of this debate all along even though the discrimination is largely against them.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

What an odd situation we find ourselves in. 10 years ago if you asked any college liberal

“ if a business discriminates against someone that isn’t a legally protected group yet does that make it ok?”

they would have went raving on about how discrimination is discrimination.

now here we stand in 2020 with liberals calling for discrimination and conservatives still haven’t figured out they were on the wrong side of this debate all along even though the discrimination is largely against them.

It hasn't really changed. Democrats (liberals) have always been the party of discrimination and segregation. Now they're just more out in the open about it. Oh, and it's 2021 now.