Vaccines for pneumococcal pneumonia are also being pushed for seniors (65+).Massive vaccination campaign covering a broad age range: Vaccinations for Gulf War I and II
Vaccine for old, high risk individuals: Annual flu vaccines
Vaccines for pneumococcal pneumonia are also being pushed for seniors (65+).Massive vaccination campaign covering a broad age range: Vaccinations for Gulf War I and II
Vaccine for old, high risk individuals: Annual flu vaccines
Don't forget, Thalidomide actually did relieve symptoms of morning sicknessIt's just a giant pissing contest right now. By the end of this year, or even maybe a few years, the final results of the human experiment will be revealed.
No. This is untrue. Development of mRNA vaccines goes back 30 years. The primary reason no mRNA vaccine had been sought for market authorization before now has little to do with efficacy or safety (the inherent safety issues have been overcome), but for a much more mundane reason: because it simply wasn't profitable, as compared to other types of vaccines, or as a novel vaccine. The pandemic changed that calculus.There is a group of anti-vaxxers that don't want any vaccine. They have been around since long before wuhu.
There is another group of skeptics for this particular wuhu vaccine.
This vaccine deserves more skepticism than most. Not because of some of the wild conspiracy theories but because it is a new type of vaccine and the development and testing were rushed and and because of some known liars pushing it. There are real risks associated with this vaccine.
Some of the skeptics will get vaccinated anyway and some won't. It is up to them and that is our way.
"It was approved for medical use in the United States in 1998.[3] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[8] It is available as a generic medication.[4] "Don't forget, Thalidomide actually did relieve symptoms of morning sickness
Well, it's good to see they have their priorities straight.because it simply wasn't profitable
Oh crap. It is new as far as being stuck in the public arms. That is what we are talking about.No. This is untrue. Development of mRNA vaccines goes back 30 years. The primary reason no mRNA vaccine had been sought for market authorization before now has little to do with efficacy or safety (the inherent safety issues have been overcome), but for a much more mundane reason: because it simply wasn't profitable, as compared to other types of vaccines, or as a novel vaccine. The pandemic changed that calculus.
It costs around $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Altruism only goes so far.Well, it's good to see they have their priorities straight.
Oh I get it. But if their drug had been in R&D for 30 years, it wasn't really "new" as you pointed out. Covid was just their jackpot.It costs around $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Altruism only goes so far.
No problem rushing one through when .gov buys 600 million doses.It costs around $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Altruism only goes so far.
That is approval as an immunosuppressant. Morning sickness was an off label use and it was originally marketed as a tranquilizer/sleeping pill. It never was approved for use in the US at that time (early 60s), and the scandal helped prompt the rigorous drug approval process that used to characterize the FDA"It was approved for medical use in the United States in 1998.[3] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[8] It is available as a generic medication.[4] "
Thalidomide - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
But the FDA approved it for medical use in the U.S. in 1998.
Good one!rigorous drug approval process that used to characterize the FDA
Yeah, I thought about shingles, but I guess the flu shot would be considered a vaccine.Umm......the flu shot as well as Shingles more than likely
Yeah, but the Tweet specifically called out since VAERS was turned on - which is about thirty years ago.Uh, children are getting multiple vaccines every year and have been when the 70 year olds were children.
That's totally reasonable.There is a group of anti-vaxxers that don't want any vaccine. They have been around since long before wuhu.
There is another group of skeptics for this particular wuhu vaccine.
This vaccine deserves more skepticism than most. Not because of some of the wild conspiracy theories but because it is a new type of vaccine and the development and testing were rushed and and because of some known liars pushing it. There are real risks associated with this vaccine.
Some of the skeptics will get vaccinated anyway and some won't. It is up to them and that is our way.
The Gulf War vaccinations were a pretty limited set. FWIW, I didn't even know such a thing existed.Massive vaccination campaign covering a broad age range: Vaccinations for Gulf War I and II
Vaccine for old, high risk individuals: Annual flu vaccines
What to draw on next? Therac-25?Don't forget, Thalidomide actually did relieve symptoms of morning sickness