Ok so we agree lol. I think you misread my post.Why not? I see nothing outside of rules being made by an unelected criminal agency saying anything about it. I once traded for something I thought I wanted, and traded it again 4 days later because I really didn't like it. Does that mean the AFT should have the right to come to my home, knock down my door and shoot me in the head?
If you really think they care about the numbers you're wrong. If you think they're only going to come for the ones selling a lot, you're wrong. They are coming for ALL of us. PERIOD. WE are the enemy to them and they will stop at nothing to silence us.
Does the normal collector seller buy 24 of the same gun? Current production pistols, not out of production, and not likely to go out of production any time soon. And sell at least some less than 24 hrs aft acquiring them? Do they they tell people to tell them what they want and they would try to get it for them?
Do they they tell people to tell them what they want and they would try to get it for them?
They will only learn if they want to change. By this time, its intentional. They clearly dont care.Years ago I thought that after the Branch Dividian horror, changes would be made in policy to affect arrests in better ways. Is serving the warrant where there could be no shooting and bringing the suspect to the search area an option?
And none of that should matter. I am absolutely certain that none of those things should get you executed in your own home.Does the normal collector seller buy 24 of the same gun? Current production pistols, not out of production, and not likely to go out of production any time soon. And sell at least some less than 24 hrs aft acquiring them? Do they they tell people to tell them what they want and they would try to get it for them?
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other". - Letter from John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798It's as clear as every other amendment in the Bill of Rights.
The Founders of the United States and the Framers of the Constitution were the greatest collection of human intelligence in history.
I agree with you on Young and that BS act, but I'm pretty sure what he was doing would have required a FFL before the change. It wasn't for "primary livelyhood" I that think it was closer to "primarily for the purpose of livelyhood" which would include doing it as a hobby/side hustle that you intend to make money from. Heck I know a FFL or two that run a brick and mortar store that isn't their primary livelyhood.Thanks Todd Young, the BS Communities Act (which changed the definition of "engaged in the business" to "doesn't lose money on the sales") strikes again.
Old definition: Included "for primary livelihood" or something like that. This guy made $250-$270K/year as an airport director. This is a hobby for a guy like this since if he CLEARS $250/gun and sells 150/year that's $37,500. Subtract cost per table, fuel costs, etc.
Yeah, thanks Todd Young.
I agree with you but the fact is it sounds like there was a very good chance he was breaking the law, which I stated in the part of my post that hat you left off shouldn't be.And none of that should matter. I am absolutely certain that none of those things should get you executed in your own home.
Are you a subject, serf or a citizen? If the latter then the Constitution matters and most especially the preamble to the bill of rights, and the first second fourth fifth 9th and 10th amendments. All the proceeding set clear restrictions upon the actions of the federal government. The reality that the federal government routinely flaunts those restrictions without consequences is a sad reflection upon us the citizenry.
The bureaucrats and the politicians work for the citizens, not the other way around!
Good question. If you recall the circumstances of Finicum's death during Malheur the government seems mostly concerned not with 'no shooting' but that the government has a monopoly on shooting and acts accordingly. They also seem to become especially fond of violent resolution when the subject(s) defy them and make them look ineffectual while also gaining support from the public at large as the circumstances of the charges become more generally knownIs serving the warrant where there could be no shooting and bringing the suspect to the search area an option?
People cannot be reminded this enough!"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other". - Letter from John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798
Good question. If you recall the circumstances of Finicum's death during Malheur the government seems mostly concerned not with 'no shooting' but that the government has a monopoly on shooting and acts accordingly. They also seem to become especially fond of violent resolution when the subject(s) defy them and make them look ineffectual while also gaining support from the public at large as the circumstances of the charges become more generally known
As for what was bought and sold, I doubt that the current government would care if it was safari grade Winchesters and Weatherbys as well as high quality S&W revolvers and 1911s. They do not want firearms changing hands in ways that cannot be tracked, period. That interferes with their efforts to create the comprehensive firearm registry that they also aren't supposed to have
Dealing without a license.Nice looking home. It will be interesting to find out why they thought this guy was up to something.
Nailed it.Thanks Todd Young, the BS Communities Act (which changed the definition of "engaged in the business" to "doesn't lose money on the sales") strikes again.
Old definition: Included "for primary livelihood" or something like that. This guy made $250-$270K/year as an airport director. This is a hobby for a guy like this since if he CLEARS $250/gun and sells 150/year that's $37,500. Subtract cost per table, fuel costs, etc.
Yeah, thanks Todd Young.
You can always tell when a guy responds to an early post before reading to the end of the thread.Dealing without a license.
Probably a runnerYou can always tell when a guy responds to an early post before reading to the end of the thread.