Ashton1911
Marksman
I think he was saying to require firearms training to graduate school, not as a prerequisite to ownership.
There is a motion proposed in california to require some form of crossdressing training before one can graduate highschool, whether this comes in the form of attending a drag show or taking part in a transvestite class from your school or other. Not allowing an individual to get a highschool diploma without taking a firearm safety course would increase awareness, and ensure that people know the options by the time they graduate highschool.So my eight year old won’t be allowed to shoot my .22 until after graduating high school? I’ll agree, suppressor’s shouldn’t be regulated, however, requiring firearms training is still violating the 2nd Amendment. Want kids to be safe and respect firearms and life, teach them that, that’s the parents job, not the schools.