The leftists snowflakes (Yes T lex, I called them snowflakes) need to review some of this data.
So what you're saying...
People who don't like the term snowflakes. Are snowflakes.
The leftists snowflakes (Yes T lex, I called them snowflakes) need to review some of this data.
That's true, but if we were to only let truly knowledgeable and educated people speak on any given subject, the silence would be deafening.
And, if we only let truly knowledgeable and educated people vote, there'd be, like 12 people at the polls.
If you think that there should be qualifiers for who gets to say what about the 2nd Amendment, I suggest that you skip back up to the 1st and give that a read.
It's fine for people who aren't knowledgeable to speak up on the issues and give their perspective. A public discussion of all points of view is a great way to become more knowledgeable. It's not fine to give unknowledgeable people an exclusive voice, or to claim that their voice is more authoritative, just because of their traumatic experience. It's also not fine to exclude them from criticism if they make an invalid argument, just because they've had a traumatic experience. If you're going to speak in public, your speech is just as subject to social regulation as anyone's.
So you're saying if you were to go on FaceTube and criticize Mr Hogg for his lack of knowledge about Constitutional rights and firearms in general, and for proposing feel good, unworkable solutions, that your post would be welcomed as a reasoned contribution to this debate?
So what you're saying...
People who don't like the term snowflakes. Are snowflakes.
That's true, but if we were to only let truly knowledgeable and educated people speak on any given subject, the silence would be deafening.
And, if we only let truly knowledgeable and educated people vote, there'd be, like 12 people at the polls.
If you think that there should be qualifiers for who gets to say what about the 2nd Amendment, I suggest that you skip back up to the 1st and give that a read.
It's fine for people who aren't knowledgeable to speak up on the issues and give their perspective. A public discussion of all points of view is a great way to become more knowledgeable. It's not fine to give unknowledgeable people an exclusive voice, or to claim that their voice is more authoritative, just because of their traumatic experience. It's also not fine to exclude them from criticism if they make an invalid argument, just because they've had a traumatic experience. If you're going to speak in public, your speech is just as subject to social regulation as anyone's.
So who are you pissed at? The people who've been trying to get more gun control for years, or the people who are trying to enact it now that they suddenly find themselves in power?I personally believe a lot of time has been wasted by the few overseers who've been beating the drum foe a kinder, gentler more PC INGO.
I am thoroughly P****d and if you are too, have at it and call anti's and Fudds whatever you like.
Anti's and Fudds, basically.
Irritated by all the PC mess I've been wading through.
So who are you pissed at? The people who've been trying to get more gun control for years, or the people who are trying to enact it now that they suddenly find themselves in power?
Why must I choose? Now if you had used the qualifier "more" in the first sentence ...
When has it mattered what was ACTUALLY written?
It's fine for people who aren't knowledgeable to speak up on the issues and give their perspective. A public discussion of all points of view is a great way to become more knowledgeable. It's not fine to give unknowledgeable people an exclusive voice, or to claim that their voice is more authoritative, just because of their traumatic experience. It's also not fine to exclude them from criticism if they make an invalid argument, just because they've had a traumatic experience. If you're going to speak in public, your speech is just as subject to social regulation as anyone's.
No we were (ingo in general) called out yesterday for using these terms. My original post was that the left has nothing solid to offer past the agenda. Dissarming us. Period.
In this they will shout down any reasonable advice/views/opinions that do not match what they want. Innuendo, labels, name calling and shout downs is their approach as in the town hall recently. It was stated that we on Ingo are no diff. for using the terms we use.
I argue that in a closed forum we are merely exchanging ideas and view points. There is not really a debate going on. Made no diff.
I know. I'm joking. I'm just keeping alive the "so you're saying..." meme and then saying you're saying something that you didn't say, to say that people who don't like the term snowflakes are snowflakes.
Nevertheless. Was I wrong?
I personally believe a lot of time has been wasted by the few overseers who've been beating the drum foe a kinder, gentler more PC INGO.
I am thoroughly P****d and if you are too, have at it and call anti's and Fudds whatever you like.
Yes, after my wife explains how wrong I am on most everything...Are we ever really wrong in our own minds.