You mean when he talks both sides of an issue without saying anything?I've heard nothing. But I could write him, and report back on the verbiage of his typical, gun-related, canned response, if you'd like.
You mean when he talks both sides of an issue without saying anything?I've heard nothing. But I could write him, and report back on the verbiage of his typical, gun-related, canned response, if you'd like.
But what is the burr cut chick (???) and douche nozzle going to do for a spotlight now.
Right now douche nozzle is making snarky tweets towards the president about avoiding the draft.
Speaking of agendas, anyone seen a statement from Donnelly on where he stands surrounding this situation?
While I don't agree with the kid's positions, he appears to have survived a real shooting with real bullets in near proximity to where he was.
I don't know there's anything in Basic or AIT that would scare him more than that day.
What can't we talk about then? I'm sorry but I am totally not into groupthink. And this sounds hella like that.
Donnelly was elected because the person he was facing was a horrible candidate. He faced that horrible candidate because people wanted to get THEIR "purer" republican elected, but THEIR pure republican did not appeal to the wider constituency. But also, I strongly suspect that Democrats voted in the primary for Mourdock to help him beat Luger, because that's the only chance they had to take that seat. What, exactly, did badmouthing anyone have to do with that?
If you want "our people" to get elected, you better expand "our" to much beyond you. Run candidates that people want to vote for. People didn't like Mourdock. He came off as a smarmy fundamentalist religious fanatic. And he didn't know how to handle a simple question. I voted for him, BTW.
And this just brings home what I addressed during the election season. Some of you guys are simply unwilling to take your candidates to task for **** they get wrong.
While I don't agree with the kid's positions, he appears to have survived a real shooting with real bullets in near proximity to where he was.
I don't know there's anything in Basic or AIT that would scare him more than that day.
i don't disagree. It would have been great if he nodded, went, announced that CNN had given him a script, then asked his own question.
The father of a Florida shooting survivor acknowledged Tuesday he omitted words in an email he sent media outlets accusing CNN of using scripted remarks at a town hall on guns and school safety.
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/arti...ivors-father-admits-email-changes-in-cnn-spatIn one exchange, 17-year-old Colton Haab proposes several questions to ask at the town hall, including one on whether to arm teachers. His father, a Republican gun owner, later emailed Stevenson a four-page document with a roughly 700-word speech and a series of questions he said Colton wanted to ask.
Stevenson told the father the additional language he proposed was "way too long" and Colton would need to stick to the question "that he submitted." The words "that he submitted" were left off the email sent to Fox News and Huffington Post.
While I don't agree with the kid's positions, he appears to have survived a real shooting with real bullets in near proximity to where he was.
I don't know there's anything in Basic or AIT that would scare him more than that day.
So more and more and more is coming out on this.
I am waiting for more than a few apology's to the NRA and associated 2A advocate groups/people.
Yeah thats not gonna happen.
Yep, cause the other side never admits when they are wrong...
All I ever see is shout downs. Name calling. Labels etc. Never anything solid as what should be done. They have nothing solid.
But they did introduce us to the Vagina suit. That is a strong indicator of what they are.
So much fail with that one, that's for sure. The worst part is, if you watch any "debates" where the reasonable people are shouted down, the other side sees those as victories. Not that they made valid points, not that they had logical arguments that lead to something that makes you think or could lead to changes, but that they shouted loud enough to drown out anything our side had to say. It's sad to me that the libs think that throwing a tantrum like a toddler is not only acceptable, but desired.
That was what was refreshing about Dana Loesch's performance during that townhall ambush. She doesn't get shouted down.