things like this is why dave ramsey say you need 3-6 months of expenses set aside as an emergency
People are lucky to have a job, let alone this
things like this is why dave ramsey say you need 3-6 months of expenses set aside as an emergency
Agreed, but in this economy of everything going up but wages, and many laid off or with hours cut, it's kinda hard for most. If they did have money set aside, there's a good chance they've already had to use it.things like this is why dave ramsey say you need 3-6 months of expenses set aside as an emergency
Ill tell all those not getting paid that there families are not effected. Just sayin.
FTFY. English isn't the law, but it's still a damn good idea.
Please do tell, what are their roles, those that they won't be getting paid?
People are lucky to have a job, let alone this
Agreed, but in this economy of everything going up but wages, and many laid off or with hours cut, it's kinda hard for most. If they did have money set aside, there's a good chance they've already had to use it.
I am unemployed today. One entire day wage gone that won't come back. It will happen every week until this shutdown bs gets settled. Guess it don't effect my family, tho, because I will still get paid biweekly. Just have less money in the check.
The Givernment, largely controlled by appointed (non elected) progressives, is going to make sure they keep their base happy. Their goal is to beat down the working folks, demoralize them and bring them into the hand out lines.
things like this is why dave ramsey say you need 3-6 months of expenses set aside as an emergency
I totally agree with what you're saying, but please stop using their newly minted soft speak ... they are Socialists ... Communists ... Marxists … and maybe a few other *ists.
What they are not is progressive. They are the very opposite of progressive.
Yet, if we continue use their definition of words and to play by their rules (both of which change to suit their nefarious activities), then we play right into their hands and will lose.
So because I make more than you do I should have to pay more in Obomacare fines? How does that make any sense. Using your logic then since I consume roughly the same amount of services as you(1 for 1) do then I should not have to pay more taxes because I make more than you do.I make less then probably everybody else here that still have a job, but my fines are the same as those making 100k...talk about fair.
Actually, I think his "complaint" is the opposite. He makes LESS than you do, but is hit with the same fine. Someone $1 over the cut-off has the same fine as someone $10,000 over the cut-off.So because I make more than you do I should have to pay more in Obomacare fines? How does that make any sense. Using your logic then since I consume roughly the same amount of services as you(1 for 1) do then I should not have to pay more taxes because I make more than you do.
So because I make more than you do I should have to pay more in Obomacare fines? How does that make any sense. Using your logic then since I consume roughly the same amount of services as you(1 for 1) do then I should not have to pay more taxes because I make more than you do.
Actually, I think his "complaint" is the opposite. He makes LESS than you do, but is hit with the same fine. Someone $1 over the cut-off has the same fine as someone $10,000 over the cut-off.
The "old" system was bad enough. We had to go an "fix" it by making it worse.
So because I make more than you do I should have to pay more in Obomacare fines? How does that make any sense. Using your logic then since I consume roughly the same amount of services as you(1 for 1) do then I should not have to pay more taxes because I make more than you do.
Why should the Federal Government be hurting anyone?The crux of your argument is something I flip flop on all the time. Some things I think should hurt 1 to 1, and others I think should be graduated based on ability (ie everybody's wallet hurts equally).
Why should the Federal Government be hurting anyone?