.243 Win or 6.5 CM?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • dieselrealtor

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Nov 5, 2010
    3,764
    77
    Morgan County
    To start this off, I am juggling things around a bit in favor of suppressor hosts & since I don't have kids at home anymore.

    I have a .243 TC Compass that I bought several years ago for a good price, mainly for a low recoil loaner rifle for small frame or young shooters to take deer. It is not probable but possible that I may shoot some prairie dogs out West in the future but may just use a 223 for that.

    I do not currently own a 6.5 CM

    Admittedly I have not done much googlefoo to compare the 2 calibers so this is probably an ignorant question.

    Are they overlapping with 6.5 CM being superior or are they 2 totally different animals?
     

    patience0830

    .22 magician
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 96.8%
    30   1   0
    Nov 3, 2008
    19,711
    149
    Not far from the tree
    I own both. Not far apart. If I was to have to choose it would completely depend on how far away I intended to kill things. Inside 500 yds, I'd take the .243. Longer range, the 6.5 carries more energy.

    If you reload the .243 and don't shoot a bunch, the lighter pills are real screamers. Barrel burning loads though. And it will take deer just fine with 85 to 100gr bullets.
     

    yetti462

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 18, 2016
    1,743
    113
    Unglaciated heaven
    I own both and shoot these 2 more than any of my other rifles. Main difference is the wind bucking power of the 6.5. 4' hold on the 6mm is cut in half with the 6.5 in same wind . Suppressed the 243 recoil in more tame, good for staying in scope to see misses . As 1 owner to another, get the 6.5 and have both .

    243 is probably my favorite if I were to pick.
     

    bgcatty

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Sep 9, 2011
    4,011
    113
    Carmel
    .243. They got it right the first time in 1955.
    I’ve got a 1970’s vintage Winchester Model 70 in .243 Winchester and as Trapper Jim said: They got it right in 1955!
    There is nothing a 6.5 Creed does that much better, if anything, than a well tuned .243 can do.
    Besides my rifle has classically beautiful walnut and steel; something you don’t see too often with a 6.5 Creed rifle. :wavey:
     

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    8,348
    113
    In the country, hopefully.
    Both of those are serious overkill for prairie dogs. Not that there's anything at all wrong with overkill.

    I think, in my barely educated opinion, that 6mmCM is a closer comparison to 243.
    22-250 is great for prairie dogs, but I ended up using my 6mm CM more on my last hunt just because I didn't have the right scope on the 22-250.
    Also had the 6 suppressed which was nice.

    Windage and fall, energy at distance, classic walnut on one end and battle rifle style on the other...up to you.
     

    Hookeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 19, 2011
    15,295
    77
    armpit of the midwest
    A sporter .243 for prairie dogs proly bounce and recoil enough to lessen the experience.

    Maybe not if using one of those sled things.

    Then theres powder and bullet costs if going for volume shooting.

    Have run .243 for chucks and yotes for decades. Like it just fine. Am on the hunt for another Ruger #1B. Theyre heavy which helps and look good. Still has a bit of bounce if running 12x or more mag.

    Just depends on what one likes.
    Watching impacts is kinda cool.

    Have only shot 1deer w .243.win, 100gr cup.n core. Worked but was not impressive.
     

    daddyusmaximus

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 99%
    95   1   0
    Aug 21, 2013
    9,148
    113
    Remington
    If, as stated, it's just for prairie dogs, you don't even need the .243. The .223 is plenty enough gun. (and less expensive as well)

    If you're looking for a reason to buy another rifle... It's America still. (sort of) If you want one, get it. It will mean the cost of that gun, most likely a new scope for it, and then the stocking of ammo for it... but providing you can afford it, and you desire it... go for it. Freedom baby!

    As far as the .243 goes, like a lot of others here, I'm a fan. There is a wide selection of bullet types & weights available, and it's a popular, commonly available, capable, low recoil round, that's been around for a pretty good while. I even found a factory load mine likes... a lot. When I put it in a KRG Bravo chassis, It became a sub 1/2 MOA precision rifle. (and that's with ME shooting it)

    Cammo .243.JPG
     
    Top Bottom