I've never understood why idiots think they have to stockpile 50k - 100k rounds of .22
By stockpiling today all you are doing is preventing your fellow shooters from acquiring ammo.
Any more of your co-pilots trying to die on you? Just kidding.
I've never understood why idiots think they have to stockpile 50k - 100k rounds of .22
If the SHTF, unless a person has extensive military training, no one could get off more than 50 shots of .22 in defense/fights before they themselves died. And why would you use .22 for defense?
In a survival situation, a person is unlikely to shoot more than 5,000 rnds in 10 years. And the local squirrel/rabbit population would go extinct long before then.
By stockpiling today all you are doing is preventing your fellow shooters from acquiring ammo.
So $20? That's a lot of care right there.
And it's low class to expect OTHERS who bothered to prepare to bail out those who didn't. I haven't bought 22 ammo in 5 years but I have plenty. I don't owe it to anyone.
If the entire future of shooting sports hinges on the availability of cheap and plentiful 22 ammo, you'd think a concerned party would willingly buy up ammo with their own money in times of plenty to bail out others during the next shortage at 0 profit. Can I put you down for $1000?
It's sold within minutes of being put out. If you aren't there when it is, you'd think that none was coming in at all.
I still dont get it about 22 ammo hoarding? Is it because it's cheap and people can tell everyone at the watercooler they have 20k rounds of ammo stockpiled to sound cool? Once again...you guys know a 22 wont kill a zombie right?
First off, smart people "stockpile" .22 ammo when it's cheap and no one wants it. Not when they're standing in line for it at $75.00 a brick. I, much like a few in this thread, have stockpiled a lifetime of .22 ammo. The difference is I did it back in the 80's and 90's when it was everywhere, and dirt cheap. I didn't "prevent" anyone from doing the same. I haven't purchased a round of .22 ammunition in years, and I doubt I'll ever have to, regardless of how much I shoot. To me it makes sense to purchase commodities like ammo when I'm working, and have surplus funds to do it. Not when I'm retired and don't.
I disagree, it's more about shot placement than caliber. But I do think 20k rounds is a bit excessive. Ammo has a shelf life, this is why the military discards their ammo on standard schedules even when stored under perfect conditions. If not stored properly you'll definitely experience some failures with cartridges in the future which will make shooting them a total pain in the ass. I had some older 22 WMR that had the slightest amount of vanish/staining to the cases that cracked down the side of the cases when fired. Made extracting a pain in the ass. And it fouled the chamber excessively. Ultimately I discarded them because it wasn't worth it when I had fresh ammo on hand. These were stored in a gun safe their extire existence. Not sure what happened to them, other then being 20+ years old.
I have .22lr ammo from the 1960s (about 2000 rounds I got when my stepfather died) that is shooting just fine. What is excessive to you is a fun afternoon for someone else. I know many people who think anyone who has more than a box of 50 on hand is excessive. I shoot about a hundred rounds of .22lr a week, so 20k rounds is about four years of my normal shooting. And I don't give a rat's hiney if anyone else thinks that's excessive. I can afford it (costs me about $20 a month and I don't smoke or drink, I know people who spend way more than that for their vices) and I buy it when it's not in short supply so it hasn't impacted anyone else.
Ammo has a shelf life, but it's measured in decades stored properly. With .22lr there is wide variability in manufacture so crap ammo this year may have been decent quality 20 years ago and vice versa.
Hold up there champ... don't you mean $75 worth? It's one way or the other.... it can't be both depending on which way the wind is blowing.
Some here need to read up on what the true meaning of "fair market value" truly is.
Fair market value - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fair market value (FMV) is an estimate of the market value of a property, based on what a knowledgeable, willing, and unpressured buyer would probably pay to a knowledgeable, willing, and unpressured seller in the market. An estimate of fair market value may be founded either on precedent or extrapolation. Fair market value differs from the intrinsic value that an individual may place on the same asset based on their own preferences and circumstances.
Since market transactions are often not observable for assets such as privately held businesses and most personal and real property, FMV must be estimated. An estimate of Fair Market Value is usually subjective due to the circumstances of place, time, the existence of comparable precedents, and the evaluation principles of each involved person. Opinions on value are always based upon subjective interpretation of available information at the time of assessment. This is in contrast to an imposed value, in which a legal authority (law, tax regulation, court, etc.) sets an absolute value upon a product or a service.