I don't see a path for advancement here. I see enhancing a paradigm that only highly trained people should ever be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights on school property. When we got the king's permission to keep them in our locked cars, that was moving the sticks. To me, the is more like putting a monument in the ground than moving sticks.
I can dig where you're coming from GFGT. From what I've observed, setting the clock back to 1990 (or 1982 in my case) is a bridge too far probably for our lifetimes. We're against the usual anti-2A suspects as well as the Noblesville parents and the Teacher's Union. Last year I used the word "deterrence" when I spoke in favor of the result of passing the bill. Deterrence works, and compared to where we are now with schools being unarmed victim zones? There's an action and a result in this case and the result is deterrence.