indiucky
Grandmaster
Well, it's kinda hard to disagree with that assessment.
I thought they both did well...Neither strayed from what got them where they are...
IMHO of course...
Well, it's kinda hard to disagree with that assessment.
I thought Trumps performance was abismal last night, but does the nation really need a good debater / career politician, or does it need a totally different perspective and approach?Well, it's kinda hard to disagree with that assessment.
I thought Trumps performance was abismal last night, but does the nation really need a good debater / career politician, or does it need a totally different perspective and approach?
The real winner of last night's debate? The Voyager probe, flying away from Earth at an estimated 62000 km per hour.
I thought Trumps performance was abismal last night, but does the nation really need a good debater / career politician, or does it need a totally different perspective and approach?
This one is a hum dinger: The FT Goes Full Fearmonger: Electing Trump "Would Unravel The World" | Zero Hedge
"If Mr Trump were to win, it would be a regime change for the world."
Let's do it!
This one is a hum dinger: The FT Goes Full Fearmonger: Electing Trump "Would Unravel The World" | Zero Hedge
"If Mr Trump were to win, it would be a regime change for the world."
Let's do it!
I'm not shaming anyone. Just stating facts.Let's not shame people for voting with their conscience and morals. It doesn't jive well with being pro-freedom and pro-constitution.
Correct, either of those two will likely be the winner. But I, also, want no part in that. I feel just fine abstaining from these awful people in Indiana.
Term limits, eliminate the income tax, shut the doors on the fed, limit the amount of federal agencies to a standard number (not to be exceeded), and fund some of them in a round robin budget, as needed. Only permanent agencies Dept of Defense, interior, treasury, justice, state, and transportation (others call fall under those umbrellas).
ALL of them. When a party thinks it always has your vote locked up, there's no incentive for them to work to your interests.
I think there's a disconnect between this question and response.
Kut won the internet today......
We have a choice like many elections, to choose the less of two evils. If you vote for someone who has NO chance at all, it's the same as giving at least a half vote to one of the two (Clinton, I think) that can win.Like I said.....I don't care between those two. They're both equally terrible in their own special kind of way. And a vote cast for Johnson is not wasted. If the Libertarian party gains enough votes and support to become a major player, they may get on the big stage next election cycle. So stop it with that "it's a wasted vote" BS. Have fun choosing between two liberals.
...Abstain if you want, but you are not helping the country if you don't vote! ...
We have a choice like many elections, to choose the less of two evils.
...It's not B.S.!
This^^^^!How would a mediocre showing in this election change the stage next cycle for a third party? Debate attendance is based on poll results.
sorry, but voting third party is throwing your vote away.
ross Perot gave a strong showing and gave us Clinton, it did not build a third party. Please don't give us another Clinton with third party voting
She's a Cylon....not the hot kind.
We HAVE has some great candidates, not really great nominees. But this year is special because ALL parties had their pick of some really great candidates that represent their constituents pretty well... and the voters chose the WORST POSSIBLE candidate from the field in every instance!
That was the most compelling vote for Trump argument I've seen. Interesting take.
I'm betting Bobzilla or Expat will be the first to kick the TV, throw it out the window, and break it. I suggest, opening a fund to buy a TV specifically for that reason.
You can pick up old CRT tvs at yard sales for 5 bucks all day long. I think we'd need at least 20 or 30... and we should watch somewhere that we can use real guns instead of nerf guns.
Except that Johnson has nothing going for him that would make him a good President. We can't vote someone in just because we don't like ANY of the candidates.Falls into the "we can't let the other party win" category. Refer to meme again Lots of people aren't happy with either candidate. Well.....there's another option. And if you don't vote against both and let them know you don't like the turds they're putting up for office, they're just going to keep doing it. And if everyone that said they didn't like HRC or Trump voted for Johnson, he'd win. There's lots wrong with him too, but he's a hell of a lot better than HRC or Trump.
The Tea Party!Exactly. At this point, the Republican party is imploding. Time to jump ship and get something else kicked off.
Except that Johnson has nothing going for him that would make him a good President. We can't vote someone in just because we don't like ANY of the candidates.
The real problem is the pitifully low voter turnout. Particularly in the primaries and the off year elections.
I've said for years, if EVERYONE that was eligible to vote would vote, we wouldn't have anywhere near the problems we have in this country. In that case we could not only have a third party, but a fourth and fifth party that could actually have a chance at winning elections. The voter participation in our country is disgusting!