hornadylnl
Shooter
- Nov 19, 2008
- 21,505
- 63
nope. Neither is being a troll. Maybe we should look into a law change?
Took me off your iggy?
nope. Neither is being a troll. Maybe we should look into a law change?
It shouldn't, but when the other party is engaged in self-defense too, that when it becomes a bit blurry. I am of the opinion that Martin was as equally entitled to self-defense as Zimmerman.
(and the fact do not prove either case)
People keep bringing this up and pointing out that Z could be making this up to benefit himself but you can't get M's version because he is dead.This I agree with, however, one would be remiss in not believing that Zimmerman would create a version of the story that is most beneficial to him. I doubt that anyone would do any different. For the simple fact that he killed the only other person that would offer a different version of events certainly should raise suspicion.
For the simple fact that he killed the only other person that would offer a different version of events certainly should raise suspicion.
This would mean that there is never a justifiable homicide unless you had a crowd of witnesses to support the survivor. How often does that happen? Even the witnesses that support substantial parts of Zimmerman's version are not good enough for you. Talk about bias. Why do you hate white Hispanics?
However, you did say that Zimmerman being on the sidewalk made him guilty. How about we turn this around?.
Because he should PAY. Don't you know? A civilian standing up and defending themselves without the police should PAY. They should be destroyed financially, wrecked emotionally and locked up forever.
Ok, I'm going to start calling it what it is, when people start making stuff up. Lies. CarmelHP has posted an outright lie, making him a liar. I will fully retract my statement in which I am calling him a liar, if he quotes, fully, the post where I said that Zimmerman being on the side walk made him guilty.
For even those I disagree with, I am not so bold as to make up lies in an attempt to strengthen my position.
Yep, the one where he stayed in his car while waiting for police to arrive 2 minutes later, during which time Martin attacks him, and Zimmerman shoots him in self defense.
So stepping out of your vehicle makes you guilty of manslaughter if someone later attacks you? Gotcha.
Yeah, thats exactly what's implied.
Who said he should be locked up forever?
(wonders if you are going to fall into the same trap)
Here you go:
Retraction and apology?
Oh, that's right. You just want him to be destroyed and still be free. So don't bother with the entire justice system at all.
"destroyed?" I own up to anything I posted. I said ruined. I like that the public shuns people that do stupid things.
You didn't ask for full posts. And the first and second were full posts.
Your first post flat implies that had he not been on the sidewalk he would not be guilty. There's no wiggle room there.
Yes, because defending yourself from serious injury or death is a stupid thing to do.
And for the record, "ruin" and "destroyed" are not only synonyms, but one is used in the definition of the other. Ruined Synonyms, Ruined Antonyms | Thesaurus.com
Is it the letters that hinder your understanding of the word "fully?"
That hasn't been proven.
And I did. Your first quote is complete. Full. Finished. Your quote implies Z being on the sidewalk makes him guilty. Period. You can tap dance around it all you want, but it's what you said. You can play bull**** word games, but it is still what you said.
So I will be waiting for your retraction and apology.
You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, eh? I suggest you not hold your breath if you expect an apology over CarmelHPs lie. If you are still having a hard time connecting the dots, I suggest you contact a moderator and report the post.
(Kut finds Bobby to be lacking in comprehension again)