So - that's the ME, I think. I was talking about the ER doc.
This isn't the link that I first saw it on, but:
https://www.inquirer.com/news/nation-world/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-murder-trial-er-doctor-20210405.html
This 4th wave thing remains confusing to me.
The other night, there was a segment about how the experts can't agree on whether we're in one yet. Well... then we probably aren't. The prior waves were pretty unmistakable.
So that's the importance of being on the jury. What they heard and understood is what's important.
The ER doc said that generally it can be caused by drugs, but that in his opinion in Floyd's case, it was not those things.
The ME report/death certificates are not intended for public consumption despite being public records, even in highly publicized cases. The words are used in specific ways, and can be twisted into a Rorschach test.
The report you're referencing also supports the contention that if Chauvin had...
Actually, having been part of that process live, I don't really see much of this that's played to the cameras. Like, almost none.
In every significant criminal case, the prosecution tries to humanize the victim and make them sympathetic. (Which can be difficult.) That emotional connection is...
There's an INGOer who I'm nearly certain has significant experience dealing with expert witnesses. Even in my limited interaction with that particular scenario, a pretty compelling argument about reasonable doubt starts with something like, "Now, I'm not a doctor and based on the jury...
Yeah, I've heard that things are going faster than they thought (mostly because it seems like the defense is taking a light touch to most of the cross exam). So, I think the State may rest as soon as this coming Friday.
Good morning to you, too! And sincere thanks for your post. There's alot to cover in it, and I'll likely just leave it alone for awhile. I may bring up parts of it in future conversations, though, not as a "gotcha" but to explore how that perspective plays out in light of modern events...
So I'm curious - and apologies if we've already covered it and I've forgotten - but what do you think the Annexation of Crimea was a response to? :)
Totally not an aggressive question, and I apologize if it comes across that way.
I view it more as a matter of Putin understanding that he could...
I think it was mostly small arms and support equipment. I don't think it was anything big, but could be wrong.
It was, however, more than Obama did.
(Which, in and of itself, ain't saying much.)