I heard at a LGS ISP are switching to Ruger LCPs
Well....that makes sense as that's the only cartridge they haven't carried.
I heard at a LGS ISP are switching to Ruger LCPs
Well....that makes sense as that's the only cartridge they haven't carried.
They were issued a Beretta 84 back in the late 90's early 2000's.
Yea the good ole days. You do get three mags and a slightly scuffed up pair of Jack boots with every gun though.
Ah, remember the good old days?... when police trade-ins were LESS expensive than new pistols.
Was wondering what was wrong with the ISP G21's that made them go to the sig 227?
Hopefully the switch to Sig's will cut down on the number of ND's happening during the overly complicated Glock disassembly process...?
Nice use of state funds.
chezuki923167 said:
Ah, remember the good old days?... when police trade-ins were LESS expensive than new pistols.
Hopefully the switch to Sig's will cut down on the number of ND's happening during the overly complicated Glock disassembly process...?
Glock mags were never intended to drop free.From what I was told by one of the senior state police folks, the mags did not always drop free. I don't recall him saying much about reliability issues different from that, but there may be more. The mags not dropping free was a big issue though.
Glock mags were never intended to drop free.
I will not quote the articles but you can read them in "Glock The new wave in combat handguns. Pages 216 and 246. I have seen other references but don't recall where. Other law enforcement agencies also had issues with the magazines.I'm curious why that is. What advantage is there to a mag that requires two hands to remove?
Corruption, not conspiracy. Do you have any other logical explanation for choosing an unproven model as a police issue weapon?