They offer them like that so they can get them into Ca. I had to build a Draco like that so my buddy in Ca could get it in.
That brings me to my question. Im not 21 but i could buy one of those from a private seller. Lets say i do, And i get a forward grip put on the front does that make it an AOW and would that land me in a heep of trouble?
so pistol or SBR?
so that leads me to another question. would a stockless AK be considered a pistol (or any stockless rifle really) or would it be a SBR because it would have had to be modified from rifle form??
Your problem is saying because it sorta looks like a rifle action, then it must be a rifle.
It is a Pistol because the manufacturer says it's a pistol. That's Why! It may look like a rifle action to you, but it's not. It is being sold as a pistol.
You can put a stock on a single action revolver or a Glock, but that won't make it a rifle. It's a pistol(unless you put a stock on it, then it's an illegal SBR).
They make bolt action pistols and break open pistols. They didn't just cut the stock off a rifle(that'd be an SBR). They manufactured a pistol, which you happen to think looks like a rifle.
Quit judging a gun by the way it looks!
A PISTOL AK is a pistol. It was never an AK. And it was never a rifle. If it was ever a rifle and you took the stock off and it then had an overall length less than 26 inches, it is now an illegal SBR. If you take the stock off and due to a long barrel it is still over 26 inches, you just have a funny looking rifle without a stock. but it's still a rifle, even without the stock.
See red.thats not what im saying. it's just crazy to me that the only reason is because there is no stockcause the manufacturer says its a pistol but if you put on a stock its a rifle. The only reason is because it is made and sold as a pistol and meets the legal definition. it will still be known to the manufacturer as a pistol. you just modified it at home.You can do whatever you want at home, but if you get caught, it's illegal. but say it isnt manufactured with a stock but is longer than 26 inches. could they say its a pistol?No, this meets the legal definition of a rifle. cause law says anything under 26. im not saying because it looks like a rifle i guess alot of it had to do with the lengths.
See red.
okay but if under 26 is a pistol and over is a rifle then where does that leave an SBR? is it just because if you shorten the barrel of a rifle and it still has the stock its an SBR? im confused because if it has no stock and its under 26 its a pistol. so if it formerly had a stock, putting it over 26 and you remove said stock, putting it under 26 then it becomes an SBR because it was formerly a true rifle??
thats what i mean if under 26 is pistol and over 26 is rifle what makes it an SBR? theres no in between. is it solely stock+under 26 inches? i guess thats all thats left right?
The manufacturer is not making a rifle and then shortening the barrel and taking off the stock to make the pistol AR. They are making a pistol with an AR action and defining it as a pistol.
.
no no my point there was that if YOU took off the stock it would be an SBR?Yup, if it no longer meets the definition of a rifle.
i know the manufacturer didnt start with a rifle and shorten it. that makes no sense what-so-ever. i never thought that.I wasn't trying to insult you, if it came off that way i appologize. The action it's self must be defined as a pistol or a rifle when the serial number is applied.
no no my point there was that if YOU took off the stock it would be an SBR?
i know the manufacturer didnt start with a rifle and shorten it. that makes no sense what-so-ever. i never thought that.