-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
No mask is perfect but it is better than nothing. I don't like to wear one because it is harder for me to breath because I wear it correctly, a lot of people don't. It's hard for me to keep my hands away from my face because I have alergic sinus problems so I have to wash my hands often and I try to keep distence between me and others, outside of that I have no control. But since I am a born again child of God, saved and sanctified God has promised to protect me. He has already removed my incurable cancer and saved my life, so I trust Him at His word.
Last edited:
Personally I don't believe anyone has the right to restrict our God given and Constitutionly protected freedom, however they can incourage everyone to follow known safe sientific practices but that's all, otherwise they are in violation of the law.
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China - Nature Communications
Large-scale population screening can provide insights to levels of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, the authors report a citywide screening of ~10,000,000 residents of Wuhan and show that SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
www.nature.com
Just a reminder that a study of 10 million people in Wuhan found exactly zero cases of successful asymptomatic transmission. The myth of asymptomatic transmission is the sole justification of mandatory masking of healthy people. It does not exist.
It seems we only trust "Wuhan studies" when they say what we want to hear. There have been other studies that show asymptomatic/presymptomatic people do produce enough viral load to infect other people. Do we trust those studies? Oh, hell no. They don't say what we want to hear.Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China - Nature Communications
Large-scale population screening can provide insights to levels of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, the authors report a citywide screening of ~10,000,000 residents of Wuhan and show that SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
Just a reminder that a study of 10 million people in Wuhan found exactly zero cases of successful asymptomatic transmission. The myth of asymptomatic transmission is the sole justification of mandatory masking of healthy people. It does not exist.
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
This systematic review and meta-analysis examines evidence for household transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), disaggregated by several covariates, and compares it with other coronaviruses
jamanetwork.com
We have non-Chinese research finding the same thing.
Sticking a vacuum on someone's face and telling them to cough is not the same as actual data on what is actually happening in the real world. You can create any result you want in a laboratory. Real study of real infected people in the real world shows that asymptomatic transmission doesn't exist in any statistically significant form.
Do you believe cartoons must promote and dissuade things?
Why characterize the other studies as "sticking a vacuum on someone's face and telling them to cough?" Why classify THAT one as creating "any result you want" but not the other? There are many studies on this with conflicting results. I suspect that people who have it but aren't showing symptoms can indeed spread it. In fact the quoted study from jama does show that asymptomatic spread was recorded but at a much lower rate than symptomatic.Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
This systematic review and meta-analysis examines evidence for household transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), disaggregated by several covariates, and compares it with other coronaviruses
We have non-Chinese research finding the same thing.
Sticking a vacuum on someone's face and telling them to cough is not the same as actual data on what is actually happening in the real world. You can create any result you want in a laboratory. Real study of real infected people in the real world shows that asymptomatic transmission doesn't exist in any statistically significant form.
If Asymptomatic/presymptomatic people cannot spread it, then masks are only necessary for people with symptoms, and nutty people who think it will prevent them from getting it. I kinda think that's the desired outcome.
I dunno. I think it's trying to say, don't crowd me at the urinal.
I tried using a gaiter for a mask. Much better. Can breath so much better, plus lint from the ear strap thingies don't irritate behind my ears. Bad part is, whiskers stick through it and kinda pull. Not the most comfortable.
Everything must have some greater SJW purpose.
Weren't you claiming in the past that people invading what you considered 'your' space at the grocery store needed to be confronted. Did that not increase the possibility of violence - duty to retreat and all. Isn't drilling the offender just another level of confrontation? Personally I think someone ignoring all those urinals to use the one next to mine would be pretty ghey anyway
Will the circle be unbroken?
"Why does the sun go on shining?
Why does the sea rush to the shore?
Why do the birds go on singing?
Why do the stars glow above?"
Skeeter Davis
- Status
