IrishSon of Liberty said:I firmly believe that she's currently more qualified that Obama ever was to run this country, and regardless of how the wannabe-mainstream-media spins things, I believe she'd take Obama to task in any form of debate.
/homer simpson voice
Mmmmm.... bimbo.... {drool}
/homer simpson
THANK YOU!!! Rep'dSarah Palin represents exactly what the founding fathers envisioned. A citizen legislator. And the liberals so want that not to be the case! She hasn't lost her core values to a lifetime political career. I would vote for anyone with her values, and there are a few good candidates with those same values to consider.
QUOTE "They are also building schools for the Afghan children so that there is hope and opportunity in our neighboring country of Afghanistan." --Sarah Palin, speaking at a fundraiser in San Francisco, Oct. 5, 2008
Except geography of course.
Remember, "O" thought there was 57 states in the US at one point.QUOTE "They are also building schools for the Afghan children so that there is hope and opportunity in our neighboring country of Afghanistan." --Sarah Palin, speaking at a fundraiser in San Francisco, Oct. 5, 2008
Except geography of course.
Unfortunately, she was going broke defending herself from court actions as governor; money that the state of Alaska doesn't reimburse. These attorney fees don't come cheap and went far to hurt her family. Given the amount of debt she accumulated in legal fees, she made the right decision.
So in so far as whom you support, we should all be thankful that there a number of clear choices in potential candidates now. I haven't seen such differences in the political field since Reagan.
You obviously aren't paying attention to the reason she stepped down as Governor of Alaska.I wont vote for her again. She gave up her Governor post in Alaska.
All said lawsuits, to my knowledge, were heard and dismissed, brought to verdict without conviction, nor liability.
As a private citizen, Palin became free of any constraints that she faced as governor, to engage in free enterprise, and without potential conflicts of interest. If she can use her national visibility, and or notoriety to make a couple of bucks to make up for what she lost and then some, then more power to her.
She took a crap on the people of Alaska for personal gain. So i wont vote for her.You obviously aren't paying attention to the reason she stepped down as Governor of Alaska.
She is real and down to earth, not an elitist. That scares the hell out of those on the left and right who are a part of the establishment. In my book that is reason enough to support her.