Diane Frankenstein, or whatever her name is, said years ago she would take all the guns if it were up to her. "They" have had that agenda for a long time. I'm surprised they are admitting it.
Diane Frankenstein, or whatever her name is, said years ago she would take all the guns if it were up to her. "They" have had that agenda for a long time. I'm surprised they are admitting it.
And, by the way, the article is a year old.
Eh, not to be a party pooper... this is nothing more than a blog. One civilian's opinion.
The thread title of "They now admit" is really stretching.
This one ain't the hill, and it ain't gonna stir up the troops.
Well, obviously. Look how much we all agree.Hey, if you find just one it applies to all, right?
Washington State Sheriffs refuse to enforce Gun Control. Complete story at www.gunsamerica.com/digest/washington-state-sheriffs/They want to take guns. They can say that all they want, but most police would not dare go house to house knowing full well that there are more houses than police. Most military not only know their constitutional oath but know full well that they have many family members that would be more important than storming stranger's homes.
It is starting to get old, but as long as these freedom haters keep getting elected, it will continue to get worse, one grain of sand at a time.
The main point of all this is the grass roots is now emboldened to just come out and say they want to take all guns. That is a loss of ground from our point that they do not see the need to even hide the end game.
MM
Someone has been wanting to take "our guns" since the dawn of time. There will always be someone wanting to put you under their thumb, and (hopefully) always a few willing to stand up and simply say "no".
Remember, the operative word in "gun control" isn't "gun".
I would actually disagree. The more open they are about what they really want it, the better for us. For my whole life, they've been pushing their gun control agenda while saying they "still support the 2A and still want people to have guns; we just want to keep them from criminals!" This was far more dangerous, in my opinion, because a huge portion of Americans actually believed them. Now that they're openly saying they want to ban all guns, and confiscate them from law-abiding citizens, more people are waking up, and far fewer people are ok with that.
I would actually disagree. The more open they are about what they really want it, the better for us. For my whole life, they've been pushing their gun control agenda while saying they "still support the 2A and still want people to have guns; we just want to keep them from criminals!" This was far more dangerous, in my opinion, because a huge portion of Americans actually believed them. Now that they're openly saying they want to ban all guns, and confiscate them from law-abiding citizens, more people are waking up, and far fewer people are ok with that.
So you think the 2A side is winning ground in the national gun debate?
MM
So you think the 2A side is winning ground in the national gun debate?
MM
I would actually disagree. The more open they are about what they really want it, the better for us. For my whole life, they've been pushing their gun control agenda while saying they "still support the 2A and still want people to have guns; we just want to keep them from criminals!" This was far more dangerous, in my opinion, because a huge portion of Americans actually believed them. Now that they're openly saying they want to ban all guns, and confiscate them from law-abiding citizens, more people are waking up, and far fewer people are ok with that.