2ADMNLOVER
Grandmaster
To all the folks that feel my comments are "y over the top" or "way out of line" , earning me negative rep "bud".
I feel that comments that both JosephR and dross made were disrespectful and belittling .
Instead of agreeing to disagree I'm told ,
"When grown men fight , it's not like it was on the playground at school , men die in fistfights " ---dross
" If you want to talk about situations where you can hug and kiss afterwards , start your own thread "---JosephR
so I feel like I responded in kind . I might not be as old as some of you but having spent four years in the military and six years EMT certified , I'm not a kid who doesn't have a clue what happens when men act like animals instead of using their brains either .
The article posted about the "Traffic argument ends in gun being pointed" is supposed to point out "how yelling at someone else can turn into a life or death situation" .
Ok , it does that . One choice the motorist had was to kill the man with the knife , but he didn't . He didn't "shoot him in the knee" or fire "warning shots" as some have suggested .
JoesephR tells us how he's "been there and done that " and how the man put a hand on his gun , he could've shot and killed that man , but he didn't either .
He goes on to tell people to "GTFO" and go "talk about crocheting" .
Did he "earn some negative rep " to ? Or is it a case of jump on everyone who has a different opinion than me and my friends ?
As I read the original post the BG never produced a weapon or never said he would kill you . I guess you are supposed to assume that and go with it cause assumptions are never wrong . There was a lot of talk about "he could have done this or that", and a lot of talk of "I'd shoot him"
I was trying to make the point that killing the BG might not be the best course of action .
Apparently I went about making my point the wrong way and offended a few , for that I AM SORRY , that wasn't my intent . However I wont sit back and take being talked down to either .
All opinions are welcome , and I wont tell you to GTFO if you don't agree with me .
I feel that comments that both JosephR and dross made were disrespectful and belittling .
Instead of agreeing to disagree I'm told ,
"When grown men fight , it's not like it was on the playground at school , men die in fistfights " ---dross
" If you want to talk about situations where you can hug and kiss afterwards , start your own thread "---JosephR
so I feel like I responded in kind . I might not be as old as some of you but having spent four years in the military and six years EMT certified , I'm not a kid who doesn't have a clue what happens when men act like animals instead of using their brains either .
The article posted about the "Traffic argument ends in gun being pointed" is supposed to point out "how yelling at someone else can turn into a life or death situation" .
Ok , it does that . One choice the motorist had was to kill the man with the knife , but he didn't . He didn't "shoot him in the knee" or fire "warning shots" as some have suggested .
JoesephR tells us how he's "been there and done that " and how the man put a hand on his gun , he could've shot and killed that man , but he didn't either .
He goes on to tell people to "GTFO" and go "talk about crocheting" .
Did he "earn some negative rep " to ? Or is it a case of jump on everyone who has a different opinion than me and my friends ?
As I read the original post the BG never produced a weapon or never said he would kill you . I guess you are supposed to assume that and go with it cause assumptions are never wrong . There was a lot of talk about "he could have done this or that", and a lot of talk of "I'd shoot him"
I was trying to make the point that killing the BG might not be the best course of action .
Apparently I went about making my point the wrong way and offended a few , for that I AM SORRY , that wasn't my intent . However I wont sit back and take being talked down to either .
All opinions are welcome , and I wont tell you to GTFO if you don't agree with me .