Oh please, trump has done nothing but put solid people in these roles. If he's all about fame why has he done zero press conferences?
i would like to know this too......everybody says his ego will get in the way and i have yet to see it....
Some call it ego, I call it strength of personality. He will not tolerate the slow inefficient nature of Washington. He is going to be a fantastic president.
i would like to know this too......everybody says his ego will get in the way and i have yet to see it....
Get a twitter account.
Oh please, trump has done nothing but put solid people in these roles. If he's all about fame why has he done zero press conferences?
Because people ask questions at press conferences and he'd rather not answer them. Ever seen a dictator give a press conference? Neither have I.
i see his twittes.......and i still don't see it.....
What would you like to ask him? Anything he says you disagree with and the press rips him as dangerous. I'm sure he'll do them as president, in stark contrast to Obama (dictator) not doing them
"When are you having the press conference concerning you divesting from your businesses; that you promised, then cancelled?"
"When are you having the press conference concerning you divesting from your businesses; that you promised, then cancelled?"
I have heard much talk about how President Elect Trump MUST divest himself from ALL of his properties due to a potential "conflict of interest" and the "emoluments" clause of the Constitution.
However, Trump businesses =/= Donald J Trump, legally! They are corporations, separate persons under the law. Ergo, whatever money goes into a Trump property is NOT the same as going into Donald J Trumps pocket.
Donald J Trump is one of the stockholders in these companies but that is not legally the same as the company itself.
Regarding potential conflicts of interest it is my understanding that there are NO legal requirements to avoids such, only ethical concerns. While I completely agree with being ethical this is =/= to legal, ergo the "must" doesn't apply. "Should" would, but not "must."
Regarding the emoluments clause just because Trump Tower DC makes money =/= Donald J Trump making money. While I can see that he may(?) have to divest himself of all profits for the years that he remains in office I see no reason to sell them. Surely he is allowed to make money after the fact, just as President Bill Clinton made hundreds of millions of dollars giving speeches to corporations, some of which are probably foreign owned and controlled.
So, IF Clinton could make money legally after his time in office WHY can't Trump, legally?
Is my logic or understanding flawed, and if so, how?
Regards and Happy New Year,
Doug
In an ideal world the Clinton's wouldn't make millions off speeches after leaving office either. Public servants should be able to get by on their 200,000 lifetime stipend after they leave office. I don't think your position should make you rich after you leave office.
G, a guy who needs to respond about the election, SNL, Hamilton, how hot his wife is, or any perceived slight, isn't someone without a healthy ego. Or maybe it's it's not ego... insecurity?
no ego or insecurity.....he's just speaking his mind.....
In the position he's about to hold, one would hope for a little more discretion.