The constant Rifle/Magazine vs Manhood argument.

[Car Ramrod]

Based on my recent research of numerous posts and remarks made by various anti-gun advocates, I have come to the conclusion that the size of one's magazine is in direct disproportion to the size of their manhood.

Based on this logic, I have adjusted my magazine capacities accordingly.

In half-assed seriousness though, why is the first response, remark, retort, etc to anyone carrying/owning a gun, rifle, etc always have to do with the size of that person's penis and/or lack of testicular fortitude? I don't get it. For every 100 comments, you can almost bet on 73 of those being about a penis, calling them a boy, or calling them a "man".

Anyone have any insight?

 

[BogWalker]

They're insecure themselves maybe?

Hehe, wonder what they think about the guys that shoot belt-feds!

 

[Colarmel]

With some ads, we sort of brought it on ourselves.

But it's a nice strawman, people buy guns because they're not secure in their sexuality which means they're just a bunch of dumb rednecks who we can ignore.

The reason it's used is because its easy, but the reason we're stuck with it is a beast of the industry's creation. And there are plenty of gun owners, many of whom never actually use their guns and think the Desert Eagle is the greatest handgun ever created, for whom it's actually true that buying a gun makes them manlier.

 

[The Bubba Effect]

It is envy.
They should be envious. Pity them.

You are doing what they dare not do. They hold their manhood cheap by comparison (or if not cheap, nonexistent).

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Know the sins of the preacher by the sermon.

The Arabs say, "he accuses me of having the symptoms of his disease."

 

[Double T]

I really can't find the ability to post anything that will be appropriate for this forum...

However, someone seems to have issues relating to their member that I am guessing has nothing to do with size, but rather their ability to properly function it...so they are really projecting their own feelings and disgust onto someone else.

It's not the size that matters, but how you wield it. Is that appropriate?

 

[Car Ramrod]

I really can't find the ability to post anything that will be appropriate for this forum...

However, someone seems to have issues relating to their member that I am guessing has nothing to do with size, but rather their ability to properly function it...so they are really projecting their own feelings and disgust onto someone else.

It's not the size that matters, but how you wield it. Is that appropriate?

Possibly, but my research has shown that the vast majority of these comments are made by women.

 

[GoNavy]

crr i find it strange that you own any 10 rounders

 

[Car Ramrod]

crr i find it strange that you own any 10 rounders

Other than the two that came with my G26 (10 rounders are the standard), this is the only other 10 rounder I own and it came with my Mossberg MVP.

 

[Leo]

The offensive people clearly do not know even how to rate the power of a rifle. My 375 H&H only held three rounds and my .458 WIN Mag only held 4 rounds. A magazine that came with my last .22 rimfire held 30. If you were being charged by a cape buffalo or a grizzly, which rifle would you choose?

 

[Tombs]

In half-assed seriousness though, why is the first response, remark, retort, etc to anyone carrying/owning a gun, rifle, etc always have to do with the size of that person's penis and/or lack of testicular fortitude? I don't get it. For every 100 comments, you can almost bet on 73 of those being about a penis, calling them a boy, or calling them a "man".

Anyone have any insight?

Keep in mind, you're dealing with people who are illiterate victims of the system seeking to spite anyone more educated or more successful than them.

They hate anyone who owns a nice car or a diploma as well. You'll see them use the same argument against that.

 

[El-Cigarro]

With some ads, we sort of brought it on ourselves.

But it's a nice strawman, people buy guns because they're not secure in their sexuality which means they're just a bunch of dumb rednecks who we can ignore.

The reason it's used is because its easy, but the reason we're stuck with it is a beast of the industry's creation. And there are plenty of gun owners, many of whom never actually use their guns and think the Desert Eagle is the greatest handgun ever created, for whom it's actually true that buying a gun makes them manlier.

Ewwwwwwwww! Gets ME "stiff"!!!!!!

 

[Johnny C]

I just laugh when a metro says something like that.
They have to make that statement when they see a real man, makes them feel better about being emasculated themselves.

 

[Spikedog]

I thought it was caliber. That's why my EDC is a .22 short

 

[spencer rifle]

Those who know don't care and those who care don't know.

And, yes, I do have a 75 round mag for the M70.

 

[tyrajam]

Markley's Law, from the Urban Dictionary: A variant of Godwin's Law: As an online discussion of gun owners' rights grows longer, the probability of an ad hominem attack involving penis size approaches 1.

 

[Trooper]

Remember that the charge that guns are there to compensate for libertarians lack of manhood is being made by metrosexuals who are emasculated.

Yes the leftwingers do seem to be over focused on sex. Especially screwing each other.

 

[Dorky_D]

OK, even if it is true, are the politicians in favor again lording it over us? What does that say about women anti-mag advocates?

It is a stupid insult as an attempt to shut us up.

 

[Hornett]

It's just more projection.
We see it all the time.

 

[NathanJefferson]

Isn't that the M.O.? They don't have facts, figures or any logical reasons so they resort to name calling, mockery and toilet humor.

But man, they sure told us, didn't they?


P.S. If all this inverse size stuff is true, I really need to start buying some Surefire Mag90's... *Passes the hat around*