IndyBeerman
Was a real life Beerman.....
The one you keep demanding to keep your monopoly, as you put it:
You can't spin your way out of this one, because you say exactly what law(s) you want later on-
You want government men with guns to to keep your happy little monopoly in place, as you put it, it's very simple:
See, there you have it, keep the protectionist laws in place. F the free markets. F the people. You get yours and no one else can play because you've got your licenses locked up.
Your solutions, as quoted above, limits outlets under protectionist laws to keep retailers at a minimum.
Only in your bizzaro statist world does less sellers equal more competition.
When you can comprehend what I'm saying beyond a 2nd grade level, and read correctly what I'm saying, then I will respond to your reply's.
And here's a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
Less outlets='s less competition=higher prices.
Only in your bizzaro statist world does less sellers equal more competition.
My reply was above was to a member stating let the liquor stores go out of business if they want to keep their prices high (which warm beer prices all over are fairly evenly priced for both liquor stores and grocery stores).
The less outlet's that there are, means less competition, less competition equals higher prices.
Try that working concept above, go the middle of BFE and try and buy something at the same price that has competition around it. NAtural selection plays itself out.