Its a right, not a privilege. EVERYONE should be allowed to carry in all 50 states without restriction.
Its a right, not a privilege. EVERYONE should be allowed to carry in all 50 states without restriction.
Its a right, not a privilege. EVERYONE should be allowed to carry in all 50 states without restriction.
I can support that idea.Its a right, not a privilege. EVERYONE should be allowed to carry in all 50 states without restriction.
OP said more training than most, not that all veterans were experts. (although this one is. )Why just vets? OP are you a vet? The comment about Vets having more training is not true. Having ran more than a few qualification ranges, I can tell that just because you are in the military doesn't make you a firearm expert.
I would support a veteran who is a "proper person" being allowed to carry in all states as a foot in the door.Yes we all agree it is a right, but not one honored by all 50 states. Privileges in this case is more like a written permission. And yea it should be unrestricted, but we are working on that. This would pertain to veterans and could be used as a "foot in the door" in some of the more restrictive states.
Actually, no I am not a vet. And I would say they do have more training than say 70% of gun owners. Those of us on here are only a small percentage and not very many of us attend training.
_______________________________________________Its a right, not a privilege. EVERYONE should be allowed to carry in all 50 states without restriction.
Regarding the foot in the door strategy in some of the more restrictive states: It is tempting to jump on it and say yes, since it would provide immediate short term benefit for me, as well as those residing in those states, should it ever come to pass. Since it's only a site poll, I voted no on philosophical and constitutional grounds, largely because of the same misgivings I had about the bill that eventually passed for LEOs. It fosters and furthers a type of elitism endemic in authoritarian regimes that is alien to the principles of this constitutional republic. Namely, an attitude and notion that,Yes we all agree it is a right, but not one honored by all 50 states. Privileges in this case is more like a written permission. And yea it should be unrestricted, but we are working on that. This would pertain to veterans and could be used as a "foot in the door" in some of the more restrictive states.