First it was the International Chiefs of police who signed on, then it was the SEIU/IBPO. Guess those oaths didn't mean much to some of these guys in control. Cops joining SEIU. Sheesh. Loads of links to explore here.
From The Gun Rights Examiner
From The Gun Rights Examiner
Read the rest at the source. If you can stomach it.The Brady Center has filed a friend of the court brief in the McDonald v. Chicago case.
On Saturday, we saw how they attempt to defend destruction of the right to keep and bear arms under the guise of reasonability. Yesterday, we met some un-American police chiefs who place their political career ambitions over your rights. Today, we're going to meet another signatory to the Brady brief, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers.
Unlike Oath Keepers, that is current and retired military and law enforcement professionals who place their oath to support and defend the Constitution first, and thus are deemed suspect by the state-firster crowd, the IBPO consists of officers who have sworn the same oath, but who have a competing constitution to consider.
Shall we compare the two preambles?
Here's the one establishing government exists to serve all the people:We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.And then there's this one, which assumes all the people exist to serve some in government:
We who are employed by the Governments of the United States or Canada, or by the political subdivisions thereof or therein, or by any other business enterprise therein, do pledge ourselves to improve the general welfare of all employees, their families, and their dependents, and as almost every improvement in the condition of working people has been accomplished by the efforts of organized labor, and in the interest of a higher standard of citizenship, do ordain and establish these By-Laws and Constitution of the National Association of Government Employees.Gee, no conflict of interest there. I'm sure economic self-interest never factors into things when competing constitutional priorities conflict. Right?