All we should ask for is neutrality? I disagree.
We have every bit the ability and responsibility to persuade others.
The impetus is on us to to do it in a polite manner that doesn't weaken our cause.
Why should neutrality be the best outcome for which we may hope?
Because neutrality is still in our benefit. Currently, neutral-stance allows us to carry wherever we like. Pushing for a business to become purely "pro-firearms" will alienate the other side, which isn't as civil. Then again, in our hypothetical here... the "extreme" on our end would be disallowing non-carrying people into a business... so it's not a 100% fair comparison. Since we are the ones with the freedoms and rights on our side, and they only have emotion and feelings.