I don't either. As much as I am a Glock guy and like the system, I see no real innovation going on, lots of company issues (leadership/financial & Glock family), and uncharacteristic issues with reliability in some runs of guns as of late.
S&W seems to be the company that could take a real run at cutting into the market share held by Glock.
Shooter is right though, the slightly smaller size of the pm9 makes a big difference and they really are two different markets. Still pissed at my old pm9 from the million lb slide closing on my finger while cleaning!
What I dont understand is Kahr. Where do they get off charging what they do? This will absolutely kill Kahr. I know some people who are rich dont care about cost, but for the rest of us, we'd never buy a gun that cost as much as two guns.
I bought my pm9 for $400 here on ingo. With a raven bikini holster it's a great pocket gun if i'm selective in which pants / shorts i wear. If it were just a little bigger i would not consider pocket carry.M&P aready has the Bodyguard 380. Its nice, and I dont know why it didnt get this fanfare. I agree the Shield is what people want, and I want one some day maybe. And Glock is going by the wayside here.
What I dont understand is Kahr. Where do they get off charging what they do? This will absolutely kill Kahr. I know some people who are rich dont care about cost, but for the rest of us, we'd never buy a gun that cost as much as two guns.
This pistols has me greatly re-thinknig the whats & hows of my meager "inventory"...
*sigh*
This new one, the Beretta Nano, Bersa BP, and, of course, the Kahr CW or P-9
-J-
I'm really not sure why they decided to put a safety on this model. You have a line of guns with no external safety and then all the sudden everything has one. Why mess with what you've been doing.