Now you are just making me feel worse because you are right.
He should have been the Wizard behind the curtain and let someone else be Oz.
Now you are just making me feel worse because you are right.
He should have been the Wizard behind the curtain and let someone else be Oz.
Yeah it's an interesting site. It deals more with domestic issues like economic freedom and pro-growth and doesn't really delve into foreign policy matters.Now you are just making me feel worse because you are right.
He should have been the Wizard behind the curtain and let someone else be Oz.
PS that link is a good read!
Why not? They can steal your children for being overweight and you may never get them back.
County places obese Cleveland Heights child in foster care | cleveland.com
Maybe kids should be confiscated if their parents allow them to breathe any second-hand smoke. Or if they don't brush their teeth before bed. Or if they sit too close to the television. Government will solve everything.i see nothing wrong with that. they are literally killing him slowly. 200 pounds at 8 years old? thats rediculous.
Maybe kids should be confiscated if their parents allow them to breathe any second-hand smoke. Or if they don't brush their teeth before bed. Or if they sit too close to the television. Government will solve everything.
i see nothing wrong with that. they are literally killing him slowly. 200 pounds at 8 years old? thats rediculous.
i see nothing wrong with that. they are literally killing him slowly. 200 pounds at 8 years old? thats rediculous.
i see nothing wrong with that. they are literally killing him slowly. 200 pounds at 8 years old? thats rediculous.
OK, so what if the State, in their infinite wisdom, can't reduce the child's weight, either? Will they return him to his mother? Or bury him in an institution or hospital to cover up their inability - or just bury him quietly in a graveyard? Who tracks the results when the State removes a child from his parents?
Like we need more new taxes!In all but the rarest of circumstances I think children should be treated as private property as far as the state is concerned.
88GT has a point about children needing to be considered private property as far as the state is concerned. Unfortunately, the state is coming to believe that private property is theirs if they want it.
Perhaps another way to put it is that parents need to be held responsible for their children by the community-as-a-whole instead of ceding that responsibility to the state. When I was a young parent, I would have starved before my child went hungry (and, in fact, unknown to me, my wife was put in that very situation when I was deployed to Korea). Today, children are being fed breakfast and lunch by the state (WE'RE PAYING!!) while their parents, presumably, are doing something else with their money, such as buying cars and flat-screen televisions or the latest 4G smart phone plan. If children are going hungry, we should be looking at their parents (as a society) to see what the parents are doing besides feeding their kids. The state should really being staying out of it.