Yeah... But it was an assault umbrella, so it still has to go.Such BS. Get an attorney, but first tell the property owners that they were mistaken...what they saw was only an umbrella.
Yeah... But it was an assault umbrella, so it still has to go.Such BS. Get an attorney, but first tell the property owners that they were mistaken...what they saw was only an umbrella.
Looks like they discovered this string....I've been told I will be contacted by the owner today...................My contact is not happy at the moment...................
Looks like they discovered this string....I've been told I will be contacted by the owner today...................My contact is not happy at the moment...................
IC 32-31-5-6
~snip~
(f) A landlord may enter the dwelling unit:
(1) without notice to the tenant in the case of an emergency that threatens the safety of the occupants or the landlord's property; and
(2) without the consent of the tenant:
(A) under a court order; or
(B) if the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the dwelling unit.
(g) A landlord:
(1) shall not abuse the right of entry or use a right of entry to harass a tenant;
(2) shall give a tenant reasonable written or oral notice of the landlord's intent to enter the dwelling unit; and
(3) may enter a tenant's dwelling unit only at reasonable times.
As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.16. Amended by P.L.115-2007, SEC.6
Sounds to me like going through personal belongings of the tenant and then using the discovery of a legal item to threaten and then file for eviction would be a direct violation of the bolded section of the above statute, wouldn't it?
well I know from the recordings it's not a shaw rental property. and if ther were a clause in my lease about knives I would be in BIG trouble.