Very nice! Although, I will hold out in hopes of an HK VP45...
Not to be blasfemists the 9mm PPQ's are pretty nice but from the picture that slide looks God awful like a freakin High Point's.
Not to be blasfemists the 9mm PPQ's are pretty nice but from the picture that slide looks God awful like a freakin High Point's.
Not to be blasfemists the 9mm PPQ's are pretty nice but from the picture that slide looks God awful like a freakin High Point's.
45 is bigger than 9mm so the slide is going to be bigger.
Can't wait to get my hangs on one!
However, if it looks like a PPX/Walther Hi-point, forget it
Not to be blasfemists the 9mm PPQ's are pretty nice but from the picture that slide looks God awful like a freakin High Point's.
CZ's have a higher bore axis than a PPQ 9mm.
I liken CZ's bore axis to a Sig 226 or most HK pistols, but they are pretty good for a hammer fired system.
Striker fired guns have an inherently lower bore axis and that's what I like the most about Glocks (other than their obvious awesomeness).
I gotta call BS on this. As an owner of all the manufacturers he mentioned, the CZ is not equal to the Sig and HK in bore axis. My CZ 75 is the smoothest shooting gun I have ever owned. Better than my Glock 17. Bore axis is way overblown anyways.
I'm aware of what bore axis is. The CZ style of hammer fired guns are unique in that the slide rides inside the frame, not on top of it. The makes for a barrel that sits lower in the hand than most hammer-fired guns. The PPQ has a higher bore axis than most striker fired guns. I would say they are pretty equal. I would love to see a measurement of both.
All in all PPQ, Glock, CZ, XDm, Sig, (insert name), they all are great at what they do.
I was just defending the CZ for an inaccurate comparison. Nothing personal.