To be fair, though, had the vote gone the other way, the left would be shouting from the rooftops and NOT characterizing it as narrow but as a win for their anti-Christian agenda. Also, as written, it is misleading and possibly grammatically incorrect to say the court ruled narrowly when it was 7-2. It would require another sentence to explain how the ruling applied to a narrow set of circumstances.
Uhhh... here's the original article... The word "narrowly" doesn't appear.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/04/poli...do-gay-marriage-cake-supreme-court/index.html
Further, if the above image was actually legit, the word "narrowly," should have been braced by commas. Seems like someone was cooking the books.
"Todays decision is remarkably narrow" right in the article you posted a link to
Not sure if srs.... or don't understand what was being said. "Narrow" is used to convey how the ruling doesn't have many applications outside of this particular case.
[FONT=&]By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Updated 5:01 PM ET, Mon June 4, 2018[/FONT]
Right hand star.It's square dancing....