Yep, I find the viewpoint championed by Scott Adams suasive. The theories of global warming/climate change cannot make accurate predictions (which is the gold standard test for the veracity of hypotheses); and not only do they still wish us to accept the conclusions, but they wish to make sweeping economic policy changes despite economics being another area with a poor record of prognostication
It's not doubling down, it's error squared; and it can do real damage to our economy with no realistic expectation that the underlying predictions will come true any more often than by chance
It can also make the connected few very rich.
Always follow the money