Motorcycle boots, not jack boots everyoneWe have boots on the ground in Cleveland as I type.
Up-dates will be coming.
Motorcycle boots, not jack boots everyoneWe have boots on the ground in Cleveland as I type.
Up-dates will be coming.
You're late to the party.
Absolutely incorrect. There's no 'moral equivalency' in that analogy.The judge (bench trial) said that because the evidence couldn't hang the decedents' deaths solely on Brelo, that he couldn't be sure that other officers did not contribute to their deaths, he couldn't find Brelo guilty.
I call BS.
If the decedents had sprang up once immobilized and began firing in self defense to prevent Brelo from killing them, and had thereby prevented their own demise by Brelo's death, he'd have had no problem sending those citizens to the chair for the cold blooded murder of a police officer. Just more benefits of super-citizenship.
Keep those after action reports confusing, incomplete, and mutually contradictory, and you and your friends too can get away with cold blooded murder… as long as you're super-citizens.
The judge (bench trial) said that because the evidence couldn't hang the decedents' deaths solely on Brelo, that he couldn't be sure that other officers did not contribute to their deaths, he couldn't find Brelo guilty.
I call BS.
If the decedents had sprang up once immobilized and began firing in self defense to prevent Brelo from killing them, and had thereby prevented their own demise by Brelo's death, he'd have had no problem sending those citizens to the chair for the cold blooded murder of a police officer. Just more benefits of super-citizenship.
Keep those after action reports confusing, incomplete, and mutually contradictory, and you and your friends too can get away with cold blooded murder… as long as you're super-citizens.
Have you ever files a report that was deliberately confusing, incomplete, or contradictory of your brother in blue who was right there with you? No? Then clearly, I was not talking about you.
And I still read this decision as the collective can kill you with impunity, because the judge can decide that no one of them fired the fatal, criminal rounds that took your life, while if you as an individual defend yourself with fatal self defense shots into a super-citizen, you'll fry, because there will be no doubt that you, a mere individual citizen, fired those fatal shots.
Collectivisme uber individualisme, mein fuhrer.
If I was a prosecuting attorney on that case, there is no way I would waive it to a bench trial, particularly in a large metro area. Maybe Ohio doesn't allow the state to demand a jury on felony cases, but at least here in Indiana I would definitely want a jury deciding it.
I am curious if the state agreed to have it heard by the bench.
^^ Sorry, but that's so far off the deep end, it's hard to believe it was actually written. ^^Have you ever files a report that was deliberately confusing, incomplete, or contradictory of your brother in blue who was right there with you? No? Then clearly, I was not talking about you.
And I still read this decision as the collective can kill you with impunity, because the judge can decide that no one of them fired the fatal, criminal rounds that took your life, while if you as an individual defend yourself with fatal self defense shots into a super-citizen, you'll fry, because there will be no doubt that you, a mere individual citizen, fired those fatal shots.
Collectivisme uber individualisme, mein fuhrer.
In Indiana, the state can as assert it's right to a jury trial on all felonies, and at least sometimes on misdemeanors. Not sure about misdemeanors never on the jury calendar.I didn't realize the prosecutor had control over that aspect. I thought it was up to the defendant and their counsel.
Some of us "super-citizens" believe the verdict is utter horse****. Not that you would ever consider that whilst lumping us all in to the same steaming pile of excrement that you oh-so-love to spew.
A sad day for the reputation of law enforcement and the justice system.