PMs from Infractions *wow*

[tyler34]

When was this vote on zero tolerence?

when a handful of perpetual butthurts got all riled up and whined and moaned until they got what they wanted.

 

[esrice]

When was this vote on zero tolerence?

Start here: https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/forum_support_suggestions/133770-forum_concerns.html

 

[VaGriller]

Start here: https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/forum_support_suggestions/133770-forum_concerns.html

Cliff notes?

 

[VUPDblue]

Cliff notes?

Folks were concerned with perceived uneven enforcement of the rules. They overwhelmingly motioned for a clear line in the sand and total transparency. They are now enjoying the benefits of that request.
The only ways to equally apply a rule are to either totally abandon it or replace discretion with "zero tolerance".

 

[esrice]

Cliff notes?

Members: We don't like the way things are run.
Mods: What don't you like?
Members: We want absolutely equal enforcement of the rules across the board, and no more 'Moderator discretion'.
Mods: Ok, but you're not gonna like it.
Members: Give it to us!
Mods: Ok.

 

[VUPDblue]

Members: We don't like the way things are run.
Mods: What don't you like?
Members: We want absolutely equal enforcement of the rules across the board, and no more 'Moderator discretion'.
Mods: Ok, but you're not gonna like it.
Members: Give it to us!
Mods: Ok.

That pretty much sums it up.

 

[VaGriller]

Folks were concerned with perceived uneven enforcement of the rules. They overwhelmingly motioned for a clear line in the sand and total transparency. They are now enjoying the benefits of that request.
The only ways to equally apply a rule are to either totally abandon it or replace discretion with "zero tolerance".

There needs to be something you can do when a blatant false misleading classified ad is posted. Other than "caveat emptor" as I was told. That is BS.

 

[Scutter01]

There needs to be something you can do when a blatant false misleading classified ad is posted. Other than "caveat emptor" as I was told. That is BS.

Have you tried Hoosier Topics?

 

[VUPDblue]

There needs to be something you can do when a blatant false misleading classified ad is posted. Other than "caveat emptor" as I was told. That is BS.

Do you have a suggestion?

 

[VaGriller]

Have you tried Hoosier Topics?

I wasn't the one getting scammed. I knew better.

 

[LEaSH]

 

[Cru]

I dunno... I like this thread. I guess because I just imagine VUPD sitting at his desk reading them saying "seriously?" and it's a funny mental image.

 

[Scutter01]

I dunno... I like this thread. I guess because I just imagine VUPD sitting at his desk reading them saying "seriously?" and it's a funny mental image.

VUPDBlue is far too busy and important for that. He has his secretary do it.

 

[sj kahr k40]

VUPDBlue is far too busy and important for that. He has his secretary do it.

So Cwood is reading them

 

[Cru]

VUPDBlue is far too busy and important for that. He has his secretary do it.

Oh. Well I only had Que and VUPD to choose from, and Nick is funny and animated.

I still like the thread.

(for the record, it wasn't because I wanted VUPD to be frustrated, it was just sort of "cartoony" in my head)

 

[VaGriller]

Do you have a suggestion?

Its the whole draw the line in the sand. There still needs to be some gray.

If I see my stolen gun posted for sale on INGO. Do I tell INGO before I call the police? Or should we just assume all guns posted are stolen IE "Caveat emptor"

 

[Cru]

Its the whole draw the line in the sand. There still needs to be some gray.

If I see my stolen gun posted for sale on INGO. Do I tell INGO before I call the police? Or should we just assume all guns posted are stolen IE "Caveat emptor"

I would call the police and let them handle it. Their sting ops teams are probably better than ingo's...

 

[VaGriller]

I would call the police and let them handle it. Their sting ops teams are probably better than ingo's...

In the mean time somebody here buys it.. and loses their money...

 

[VUPDblue]

Its the whole draw the line in the sand. There still needs to be some gray.

If I see my stolen gun posted for sale on INGO. Do I tell INGO before I call the police? Or should we just assume all guns posted are stolen IE "Caveat emptor"

No, there doesn't have to be any gray. INGO is not responsible for the content of any ad. We are not the item police, nor do we have any desire to be. We are merely a place to list your item for sale. As long as the item is not illegal to buy/sell/possess, we don't care how it gets represented. That's between the buyer and seller, and also why we have a feedback section.

 

[esrice]

So Cwood is reading them