North korea threaten nuclear war

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Chefcook

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Oct 20, 2008
    4,163
    36
    Raccoon City
    Any Thoughts on this guys???

    NKorea warns of nuclear war amid rising tensions

    By HYUNG-JIN KIM, Associated Press Writer Hyung-jin Kim, Associated Press Writer – Sun Jun 14, 7:26 am ET
    SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea's communist regime has warned of a nuclear war on the Korean peninsula while vowing to step up its atomic bomb-making program in defiance of new U.N. sanctions.
    The North's defiance presents a growing diplomatic headache for President Barack Obama as he prepares for talks Tuesday with his South Korean counterpart on the North's missile and nuclear programs.
    South Korean President Lee Myung-bak told security-related ministers during an unscheduled meeting Sunday to "resolutely and squarely" cope with the North's latest threat, his office said. Lee is to leave for the U.S. on Monday morning.
    A commentary Sunday in the North's main state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency, claimed the U.S. has 1,000 nuclear weapons in South Korea. Another commentary published Saturday in the state-run Tongil Sinbo weekly claimed the U.S. has been deploying a vast amount of nuclear weapons in South Korea and Japan.
    North Korea "is completely within the range of U.S. nuclear attack and the Korean peninsula is becoming an area where the chances of a nuclear war are the highest in the world," the Tongil Sinbo commentary said.
    Kim Yong-kyu, a spokesman at the U.S. military command in Seoul, called the latest accusation "baseless," saying Washington has no nuclear bombs in South Korea. U.S. tactical nuclear weapons were removed from South Korea in 1991 as part of arms reductions following the Cold War.
    South Korea's Unification Ministry issued a statement Sunday demanding the North stop stoking tension, abandon its nuclear weapons and return to dialogue with the South.
    On Saturday, North Korea's Foreign Ministry threatened war on any country that dared to stop its ships on the high seas under the new sanctions approved by the U.N. Security Council on Friday as punishment for the North's latest nuclear test.
    It is not clear if the statements are simply rhetorical. Still, they are a huge setback for international attempts to rein in North Korea's nuclear ambitions following its second nuclear test on May 25. It first tested a nuclear device in 2006.
    In Saturday's statement, North Korea said it has been enriching uranium to provide fuel for its light-water reactor. It was the first public acknowledgment the North is running a uranium enrichment program in addition to its known plutonium-based program. The two radioactive materials are key ingredients in making atomic bombs.
    On Sunday, Yonhap news agency reported South Korea and the U.S. have mobilized spy satellites, reconnaissance aircraft and human intelligence networks to obtain evidence that the North has been running a uranium enrichment program.
    South Korea's Defense Ministry said it could not confirm the report. The National Intelligence Service — South Korea's main spy agency — was not available for comment.
    North Korea said more than one-third of 8,000 spent fuel rods in its possession has been reprocessed and all the plutonium extracted would be used to make atomic bombs. The country could harvest 13-18 pounds (6-8 kilograms) of plutonium — enough to make at least one nuclear bomb — if all the rods are reprocessed.
    In addition, North Korea is believed to have enough plutonium for at least half a dozen atomic bombs.
    North Korea says its nuclear program is a deterrent against the U.S., which it routinely accuses of plotting to topple its regime. Washington, which has 28,500 troops in South Korea, has repeatedly said it has no such intention.
    The new U.N. sanctions are aimed at depriving the North of the financing used to build its rogue nuclear program. The resolution also authorized searches of North Korean ships suspected of transporting illicit ballistic missile and nuclear materials.
    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the new U.N. penalties provide the necessary tools to help check North Korea's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons.
    The sanctions show that "North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver those weapons through missiles is not going to be accepted by the neighbors as well as the greater international community," Clinton said Saturday at a news conference in Canada.
     

    Dryden

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2009
    2,589
    36
    N.E. Indianapolis
    The sanctions show that "North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver those weapons through missiles is not going to be accepted by the neighbors as well as the greater international community," Clinton said Saturday at a news conference in Canada.


    Oooooo, THAT ought to scare those mean old North Koreans.:cool:
     

    SavageEagle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    19,568
    38
    I think that all his BS has gone to his head and since the stalemate in the 50's he thinks he's untouchable. Also, we don't know of any back door deals they may have with China or any other Countries. They may actually have the backing of someone else and we may not know it. To enter into war with NK would be a bad idea at this time.
     

    Dryden

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2009
    2,589
    36
    N.E. Indianapolis
    I disagree, I don't think (and NK obviously also doesnt think) we'd do anything at all, at least not with our nations current Commander in Chief heading up our military.

    I agree. I think that's why they're doing all this B.S. They understand that Osamabama and Hillary will wring their hands and strongly condemn the N. Koreans. Ooooooo, they're worried.
     

    m4_dave

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Apr 23, 2009
    65
    8
    North Central IN
    He did this crap before and Bill Clinton went over there and payed him to stop.I have seen that country is really broke.I think he's betting Obanga will do the same.Bush wouldn't give him crap.
     

    mwilson

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Apr 13, 2009
    576
    16
    franklin
    korea

    He did this crap before and Bill Clinton went over there and payed him to stop.I have seen that country is really broke.I think he's betting Obanga will do the same.Bush wouldn't give him crap.

    BINGO. we have a winner, think he wont bail them out to?
     

    Panama

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Jul 13, 2008
    2,267
    38
    Racing Capital
    Obama would never in a million years,
    but if Kim Jong Mentally Ill wants a nuke,
    we should give him one of our old ones!

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwlNPhn64TA&feature=related"]YouTube - Tsar bomba[/ame]
     

    Octomonkey

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 19, 2009
    113
    16
    Markle
    It's all a game. Nuclear this, nuclear that...we do sanctions and give them food/oil/whatever to shut them up for a while. Cycle repeats.
     

    IrishSon of Liberty

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Agreed, Kim Jong-Il is a whack job, but don't take his words lightly. He's continually grown more unstable over the years, and he DOES act on his words. Much like any other terrorist, he threatens and then acts. Don't be so quick to dismiss the last missle test. The first two stages of that rocket performed flawlessly. The only part the "fizzled out" was the third stage, or warhead. Therefore, they have the launch, and they know they have the range to reach our western shores, now add in the nuclear technology that they've been working on behind the scenes, and it paints a picture of a whack job going out in a blaze of glory. (Reference whack job in Holocaust museum shooting)

    If they were to send a nuke that successfully reached the western shores of America, what kind of damage do you think that would create? One placed in the Pacific Northwest, and another in the SoCal region. Take that fallout, and introduce it into the jetstream. I'll let you look at a map and figure it out.

    If anyone is being a blowhard here, it's the UN and their sanctions. Maybe I shouldn't jump to such a drastic and tin-foil-hat hypothesis, but if you remember the other Hussein, Sadam; the UN sanctions didn't do a whole lot to dissuade him from making atrocious acts against innocent lives. Now, couple that philosophy with the military thought process of this whack job based upon 1950's perception of war, and God only knows what he'll do next. There is no threat of punishment or repercutions if he acts. A monetary fine, a few ships get boarded (that N. Korea won't authorize to search - based upon fine print of UN sanctions), and nothing changes.

    Why wouldn't he act? What's going to stop him from launching? I'm just saying...

    :patriot:

    The Unite or Die Project
     
    Top Bottom