It will interesting to see if this gets taken seriously by the democrats and if they do, they try to demonize Trump with it and how Trump would respond.I love his moxey
Why shouldn't all of ones god given rights, be restored after you have paid your dues?If only HR9534 included verbiage which prohibited the federal government from classifying everyone with a federal felony as a "prohibited person". There has to be a way to restore gun rights to non-violent federal felons today, but it seems as if the Supreme Court kicked those opportunities back down to the lower courts to "try again" which only prolongs the injustice of not allowing those non-violent felons to have their Second Amendment rights restored.
If it did get traction, there would be a mass shooting the day before the vote...Sad this is required.
Sadder still this will go nowhere.
That needs to happen soon. Sharing your Netflix password too many times in Tennessee shouldn’t make you lose 2A rights.If only HR9534 included verbiage which prohibited the federal government from classifying everyone with a federal felony as a "prohibited person". There has to be a way to restore gun rights to non-violent federal felons today, but it seems as if the Supreme Court kicked those opportunities back down to the lower courts to "try again" which only prolongs the injustice of not allowing those non-violent felons to have their Second Amendment rights restored.
Straight out of their playbook.If it did get traction, there would be a mass shooting the day before the vote...
There is already a mechanism in place to restore one's 2nd amendment rights after revocation.If only HR9534 included verbiage which prohibited the federal government from classifying everyone with a federal felony as a "prohibited person". There has to be a way to restore gun rights to non-violent federal felons today, but it seems as if the Supreme Court kicked those opportunities back down to the lower courts to "try again" which only prolongs the injustice of not allowing those non-violent felons to have their Second Amendment rights restored.
In principle I agree.Why shouldn't all of ones god given rights, be restored after you have paid your dues?
My opinion with that is pretty simple. If one is not sound enough to restore all of their God given Rights we should keep them incarcerated or put them to sleep.In principle I agree.
But some people are the rare example of someone who just will not/cannot exist in a civil society.
Well......yeah.My opinion with that is pretty simple. If one is not sound enough to restore all of their God given Rights we should keep them incarcerated or put them to sleep.
devils advocate. There can be a middle ground where they can be out, but with limitations.My opinion with that is pretty simple. If one is not sound enough to restore all of their God given Rights we should keep them incarcerated or put them to sleep.
We are still very young as a Country, the general public will eventually grow tired of that behavior and then that happens, things will change for the better.Well......yeah.
Unfortunately, in this day and age, they barely put a dent in the mattress before they're bounced back into "public".
I don't have any middle ground with our Given Rights. If one is in jail or prison you have no rights. You do your time, all rights need to be restored.devils advocate. There can be a middle ground where they can be out, but with limitations.
But I am 100% behind non violent offenders being restored. The geeky guy in accounting that embezzeled 10k and served 5 years should have his gun rights restored. The dude that robbed a liquor store and shot (but didnt kill the clerk), not so much.