I think there is a deep misunderstanding of anarchism and The Framers.
The Framers were very far away from anarchism. To think that they would smile on this behavior is mistaken.
That's not what I was suggesting. I was only saying that I don't find it that incredibly strange that an anarchist would try to 'invoke' Constitutional rights. If we believe them to be inherent, then it doesn't really matter what we call them (the rights).