MilitaryArms
Master
- Apr 19, 2008
- 2,751
- 48
You bastard, you tricked me!Believe it or not, demonstrating that was my intention when I posted in this thread.
You bastard, you tricked me!Believe it or not, demonstrating that was my intention when I posted in this thread.
Really broad brush there Coach. Since you are so much better than the cops don't call them like you say. Just have them do the report and then they can learn from you since you will be able to handle any situation perfectly.
Coach, you're getting soft on us.
I suspect the guy driving the truck was killed. If he wasn't, he's one lucky SOB! The camera man and the cops shooting at each other in a crossfire certainly are very lucky that no good guys were killed.That looks like a wild west shootout. Lucky someone wasn't killed.
Wow, that's amazing. Yeah, I've done some testing shooting through car windows at targets. I know first hand how it can cause crazy flight characteristics.Actually he only got hit in the shoulder. Glass does very strange things to bullets. Many of the hits to the vehicle were placed where you would expect them to be but deflection caused the bullets to stray off target.
M16's have absolutely no useful purpose on a police force (select fire). There aren't very many safe situations I can think of where unaimed automatic fire would be useful or safe in a urban setting. MP5's in well trained hands, I'm not opposed to either.
So you think full-auto 5.56 fire by patrol officers in urban area's is as safe as aimed single shots?I'm no police officer but I'm pretty sure they don't train to shooting from the hip...asinine!
The only "safe situation" that your going to be in while discharging a firearm is going to be at the range, and even then thats not completely safe.This little guy is digging himself a deeper hole...
1) It sounds to me like you've spent far more time watching movies than spending any trigger time behind a M16, airsoft doesn't count.Other than in the movies, MOST of the time you'll be shooting short CONTROLLED bursts. Of course its not as safe. When the bg's are coming with full auto, its nice to not be outgunned. And again, they are not being trained to shot from the hip or pray and spray. The police have to be ready for anything and guess what, the guns can be fired in semi-auto... There's always going to be accident whether its from a M16, AR15, shotgun or pistol.
1) It sounds to me like you've spent far more time watching movies than spending any trigger time behind a M16, airsoft doesn't count.
2) In the ensuing investigations post officer involved shootings they usually discover the officer can't recall the exact number of rounds fired. The officer will say he fired 3-4 rounds when in reality he emptied his magazine. When bullets start flying "controlled bursts" go out the window with all but the most seasoned combat vets or highly trained SWAT officers.
3) Most officers barely qualify with their duty sidearm. You think the average patrol officer is going to be highly trained in the use of full-auto fire?
4) Full-auto fire in military settings is used on area targets and as suppressive fire. Even hardcore grunts know that if you want to end a fight by killing the "BG", it's aimed deliberate fire you need. If you're suggesting officers should use military suppressive fire tactics in urban settings, this conversation is over because... well, I don't waste my time trying to explain the obvious to people who refuse to listen.
5) No one said anything about "shooting from the hip". If you think putting a M16 in your shoulder and flipping the switch to FA yields tight little groups at 50 yards, well... you have little or no experience with the M16.
6) You nonchalantly say "there's always going to be accidents" as if that's an excuse to send fully operational M16's out on the street in untrained hands. Well Hell, why stop with M16's? Let's give them M240's, M249's, M79's to go with the M16's and even AT4's for those hard to breech barricades.
7) There's a reason most departments disable the full-auto feature on government M16's... can you guess why?
Oh, I don't know... maybe because I've been present at many qualifications and for more than one department. Most gun-nut officers will also admit that many non-gun enthusiasts on their department are horrible shots... and many only fire their weapons when it's mandated they do so."Most officers barely qualify with their duty sidearm." My question to you is, where's your evidence? Thats what I thought...
Yes, they do. They get a single rifle course and some have to qualify with it every year. WOW. You'll give someone a single course in the use of a full-auto M16 and turn them loose on the streets with it? I wouldn't turn a Marine loose on Iraq with a single rifle course under his belt, why the Hell would a turn a patrol officer loose on the city streets with one? Thank God most departments don't."send fully operational M16's out on the street in untrained hands" Again, evidence? And yes, they do get training.
I'm sorry, where did I say anything about "credit"? I have the utmost respect for all law enforcement.You are obviously not giving them enough credit for what they do and think that every officer out there who is risking his and her life everyday (to keep you safe)is poorly trained, cant make smart split second decisions and should be outgunned by the BGs...
Oh yes, I'm stirring the pot.This pissing match should have ended long ago. Full-Auto, I think you are trying to stir the pot more than argue a point. This is evidenced by you referring to 40cal's trigger time as being behind AirSoft arms, and speaking to him like a child. I don't usually get involved in these things but, damn, build a bridge and get over it already! Just agree to disagree!