-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Liberal news anchor utterly destroyed....
- Thread starter HICKMAN
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=0
Washington Times-28 June 2005
"Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation."
Police have no responsibility to protect individuals (reference)
"...There have been more than 10 various Supreme Court and State cases the individuals have never won."
Washington Times-28 June 2005
"Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation."
Police have no responsibility to protect individuals (reference)
"...There have been more than 10 various Supreme Court and State cases the individuals have never won."
The point that needs to be made more often was his point that we citizens face the same scum that the police do. There is no logical argument that disarms citizens while allowing police to carry the weapons removed from the population. In fact, I think citizens have more of a need for high capacity magazines and ARs than some police do. A metropolitan police officer has a decent amount of support riding with him or her on a daily basis. A homeowner does not. When the door is kicked in while the homeowner is sleeping, he or she is responsible for handling the situation alone and there is no backup showing up until after the dust settles. What a homeowner has in their magazine is sometimes all they are going to have to handle the situation. It had darned well be enough.
But, even that argument does not touch on the need for the 2nd Amendment. 10 years ago, it might have been a stretch to say we need to embrace the 2nd Amendment to limit our own government, but here we are, just 10 short years later and look where we are. We have a largely corrupt government that can do unspeakable things in the name of homeland defense. What will we face in 10 more years if we allow the seat of power in this country to rest with the government and them alone? How long did it take for Germany to go from being a normal country to a country where people disappeared for holding views that ran against the governments? Had Germany had a 2nd Amendment of their own, how different would history have turned out?
But, even that argument does not touch on the need for the 2nd Amendment. 10 years ago, it might have been a stretch to say we need to embrace the 2nd Amendment to limit our own government, but here we are, just 10 short years later and look where we are. We have a largely corrupt government that can do unspeakable things in the name of homeland defense. What will we face in 10 more years if we allow the seat of power in this country to rest with the government and them alone? How long did it take for Germany to go from being a normal country to a country where people disappeared for holding views that ran against the governments? Had Germany had a 2nd Amendment of their own, how different would history have turned out?
Note the kind pressure he used in the discussion of projection.
One reason I do Appleseed and instruct otherwise is to get people to stop projecting by experiencing and mastering a firearm.
In most cases, and anti is only an anti because he/she has not gone to the range yet.
One reason I do Appleseed and instruct otherwise is to get people to stop projecting by experiencing and mastering a firearm.
In most cases, and anti is only an anti because he/she has not gone to the range yet.
That guy should be nominated "Rambling Ignorant Liberal" of the year. He made my head hurt with his stupidity.
I love how rattled the Anchor gets when the other guy says he is armed
Yea, I thought the anchor was going to pee his pants when he found out he was in a discussion with an armed person...Bill.
I love how scared the host is when Mr. Morgan says he is armed now.
"Well that's scary.....you have a gun on you now??"
He's lucky the thing didn't jump free from its holster and start spraying high power 9mm bullets around the studio
"Well that's scary.....you have a gun on you now??"
He's lucky the thing didn't jump free from its holster and start spraying high power 9mm bullets around the studio
Isn't it correct that when someone describes a gun as an "AK47", the main point that they are trying to convey is that it is a gas operated semi-automatic weapon regardless of the caliber? It could be a 12 gauge like a Saiga, or a 7.62 rifle, or similar. Why doesn't anyone ever bring up that point. An "AK47" design isn't a bad thing. It is very reliable. It is just the mechanism by which the semi-automatic weapon operates. Correct? Why doesn't anyone ever point that out?
Wow!
That video defines the word "owned." That interviewer was pathetic in every conceivable way. I'd bet he assumed he was going to easily dominate some hillbilly and then things didn't go as he expected. HAH!
Keith Morgan is the kind of guy we need in the public eye as much as he can tolerate.
That video defines the word "owned." That interviewer was pathetic in every conceivable way. I'd bet he assumed he was going to easily dominate some hillbilly and then things didn't go as he expected. HAH!
Keith Morgan is the kind of guy we need in the public eye as much as he can tolerate.
Last edited:
Kieth Morgan absolutely nailed it! That is how you debate!
I will give the host a little bit of credit. While he went down the usual roads of red herrings and absurd and emotional arguments, he took his beatdown like a man. Most left-wing media tools, like Piers Morgan, Rachel Madcow, and Chris Mathews would have been reduced to screaming at their opponent in the infantile belief that it's the loudest argument that wins.
Kieth is also dead-on in his response to the absurd nuclear weapons statement. "A well regulated militia" at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment meant, "a well-functioning body of armed citizens." The people of the nation were expected to be its defenders - to be armed with guns and proficient in their use. The standing military obviously had the heavy weapons of the day -- cannon. The citizens were not expected to have their own cannons, of course, but they were to be as well armed and prepared as any military infantryman.
I will give the host a little bit of credit. While he went down the usual roads of red herrings and absurd and emotional arguments, he took his beatdown like a man. Most left-wing media tools, like Piers Morgan, Rachel Madcow, and Chris Mathews would have been reduced to screaming at their opponent in the infantile belief that it's the loudest argument that wins.
Kieth is also dead-on in his response to the absurd nuclear weapons statement. "A well regulated militia" at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment meant, "a well-functioning body of armed citizens." The people of the nation were expected to be its defenders - to be armed with guns and proficient in their use. The standing military obviously had the heavy weapons of the day -- cannon. The citizens were not expected to have their own cannons, of course, but they were to be as well armed and prepared as any military infantryman.
Starting with our President.
I support the idea of legalizing RPG's, and nuclear bombs. If you can financially handle the hit of making/buying one and some how figure out a way to use it for ONLY self defense without causing collateral casualties (other civilians) then it should be okay. Same with having an M1A1, or an F-18 E/F.
But aside from that. This is one of the best interviews that I have seen. A lot of uh's and um's to start the interview but it clears out and he does a great job of reining in the host back to the topic at hand.
But aside from that. This is one of the best interviews that I have seen. A lot of uh's and um's to start the interview but it clears out and he does a great job of reining in the host back to the topic at hand.
Site Supporter
Staff online
-
GodFearinGunTotinSuper Moderator -
Cameramonkeywww.thechosen.tv -
d.kaufmanStill Here
Members online
- bocefus78
- cubstuff
- jaymark6655
- G_B_C
- Aggar
- bogus
- DoggyDaddy
- latj
- GodFearinGunTotin
- tsm
- ftbstrd
- Doug
- tbhausen
- Dirtebiker
- bwframe
- Emerson Dambiggins
- JimH
- Clark & Addison
- tcecil88
- Franc
- wagyu52
- ditcherman
- Godbybe
- Bowman78
- akethan
- Timjoebillybob
- KJQ6945
- qoller
- cbhausen
- sloughfoot
- tca1352
- StoneMilker
- ChristianPatriot
- gregkl
- AllenM
- fullauto 45
- 7920drew
- pokersamurai
- Mister K
- Wolfhound
- slims2002
- Cameramonkey
- gdun67
- mr.steve
- RangeJunkie
- nm0369
- JohnnyTre
- BrentG
- d.kaufman
- ChrisK