I don't facebook much at all, but I did share this
.
We are to have the same firepower as the "infantry", in other words, small arms, rifles, pistols, bayonets. No infantry carries nuclear arms with them.
He did a good job of throwing it back to the "rational debate"
Ok, yeah he did get to squeeze out a quick answer I guess and please understand, I am not arguing anything here. I just have a hard time explaining this to someone when it comes up in conversation.
Good find! I hate to say it but the journalist brings up a point that I stumble with explaining. If we are to have the same "firepower" as the government where is the line drawn? He brings up grenade launchers and nuclear weapons. Obviously we don't need nuclear weapons in everyone's hands but how as a group do we rationalize the distinction? Unfortunately, Mr. Morgan was not allowed to answer.
When they use "nukes" to counter the equal firepower point, they are replacing the logical conclusion of our position with a logical extreme to discredit our point.
I don't know of any range we could take our nukes to to test fire them. Any ideas?
More than spanked. He got ANAL CRUSADED!I'd say that reporter got spanked. Great video. Thanks for the link.
You are armed right now?
Keith met with his senator today and what he posted on Facebook is something everyone should read. It includes what the senator told him the press was going to do and why he did not care what gun owners thought:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/WVCDL/permalink/10151446550999225/