Pres is being pretty arrogant, whiney and dismissive. We would be foolish to let him have his way on this.
I wouldn't be above telling him to **** right the hell off.
Pres is being pretty arrogant, whiney and dismissive. We would be foolish to let him have his way on this.
I wouldn't be above telling him to **** right the hell off.
We just need to make it clear to our senators and Mitch to stay the course.
Well luckily old Coats is one of Mitch's good ol' boys. Being so close to retirement he'd never vote wrong. Right?
Being squishy on such subjects is what got us Donnelly. We know how he'll vote for sure, now don't we?
I read somewhere in the last day or so, even Mr.-the-president-has-a-right-to-have-his-nominations-confirmed-Rand Paul say "It’s going to be very, very, very difficult to get me to vote for a SCOTUS nomination from this president."
Like I said, I think it's fair to vote down ideological extremists. Especially after Bork.
At almost a year left in Obama's administration, even though I love the thought of flipping him the proverbial bird over this appointment, I don't know that the smart move is the line in the sand. I think the smarter move is to call on him to nominate someone that can get confirmed. But that would be predicated on the assumption the republicans could stick together and Bork the crap out of whoever he sent up.
At almost a year left in Obama's administration, even though I love the thought of flipping him the proverbial bird over this appointment, I don't know that the smart move is the line in the sand. I think the smarter move is to call on him to nominate someone that can get confirmed. But that would be predicated on the assumption the republicans could stick together and Bork the crap out of whoever he sent up.
One problem with Obama was that his mother "supposedly" renounced her citizenship.
I CANNOT BELIEVE that he has the gall to accuse Republicans of 'reading things into the constitution that just aren't there'. What. The. ****.
I CANNOT BELIEVE that he has the gall to accuse Republicans of 'reading things into the constitution that just aren't there'. What. The. ****.
I CANNOT BELIEVE that he has the gall to accuse Republicans of 'reading things into the constitution that just aren't there'. What. The. ****.
Republican Presidents have done that. Justice Kennedy, mentioned today by the President comes to mind (the perpetual "swing" vote). I'd like to think this could happen, but I sense that the President knows that the GOP is week in resolve.
Why would he nominate someone that can get confirmed.
They could nominate the most left wing ideologue they can, then blame the right for not confirming, then claim they NEVER did it.
Not following.I wouldn't think the antichrist could say that with a straight face. Oh wait, maybe he did....