I’m just curious of the sentiment here. Maybe it’s posted elsewhere, if so please direct me.
Do you guys consent to deploying a special squad to “handle” some misdemeanor level crime (if crime at all) on unarmed citizens trying to protest?
You don’t have to agree with the protesting, but do you agree with the use of these tactics?
To me, this is a bit overreaching. I mean let’s say gun control starts being debated and there’s a threat of taking away guns. Does this not set precedence for the federal government to override states and deploy special forces against gun-rights activists?
This just seems very Orwellian to me.
Curious to your thoughts.
Do you guys consent to deploying a special squad to “handle” some misdemeanor level crime (if crime at all) on unarmed citizens trying to protest?
You don’t have to agree with the protesting, but do you agree with the use of these tactics?
To me, this is a bit overreaching. I mean let’s say gun control starts being debated and there’s a threat of taking away guns. Does this not set precedence for the federal government to override states and deploy special forces against gun-rights activists?
This just seems very Orwellian to me.
Curious to your thoughts.