I was agreeing with you. Voting machines are VERY problematic.Don't get it twisted, if we don't take the house I will be right there with them. That would mean something that would be virtually impossible happened. Additionally, doesn't it seem like voting machines are increasingly having more "problems". You would think as technology advances, those "problems" would go away. Things that make you go hmmmmm
Depends on the language of the bill.I really don't give two s**ts what their intent was.
The result would be to remove the rights of the many parents of terminally ill infants to decide what's best for their baby and place the decision in the hands of the state.
Give states a deadline by which votes must be tallied and reported. Miss the deadline and officials responsible get fined. Make it $10k for every hour they're late. Wanna bet they'd figure out how to quickly and efficiently count votes.I was agreeing with you. Voting machines are VERY problematic.
As you say the machines seemingly are having a lot of issues. BUT, why primarily in swing states? Why are the votes counted in almost all other states, no matter red or blue, but not purple states? Why do purple states need several days to do what other states do in 5 hours? It is not one state here and one state there, it is the same states every time…
To me the logical answer is simple, FRAUD. What other answer is logical?
Incompetence? Or bothI was agreeing with you. Voting machines are VERY problematic.
As you say the machines seemingly are having a lot of issues. BUT, why primarily in swing states? Why are the votes counted in almost all other states, no matter red or blue, but not purple states? Why do purple states need several days to do what other states do in 5 hours? It is not one state here and one state there, it is the same states every time…
To me the logical answer is simple, FRAUD. What other answer is logical?
The prolife movement is obsessed with "corner cases" like the one you describe. It's partially a result of having been strung-along for decades by politicians like Reagan, who could have "outlawed" abortion but didn't. If RvW had been overturned 20 years ago, this experience could have potentially blown over before social media controlled our lives. But that's not what happened.I really don't give two s**ts what their intent was.
The result would be to remove the rights of the many parents of terminally ill infants to decide what's best for their baby and place the decision in the hands of the state.
F**k that.
If you want a law to do some good, write a good law. This law was written as a talking point. Something they assumed would motivate their base and sail through without much opposition.
I wasn't getting crappy. Hope you didn't take it that way. You make a very valid point that I haven't even considered. It does seem all the problems happen in swing states. Walks like a duck, quakes like a duck, its probably a duck. In the end, as long as we take the House, I'm good. Nothing ever gets done in Washington. Both sides of the ail are riddled with greedy, immoral snakes. Lesser of two evils at this point in the game.I was agreeing with you. Voting machines are VERY problematic.
As you say the machines seemingly are having a lot of issues. BUT, why primarily in swing states? Why are the votes counted in almost all other states, no matter red or blue, but not purple states? Why do purple states need several days to do what other states do in 5 hours? It is not one state here and one state there, it is the same states every time…
To me the logical answer is simple, FRAUD. What other answer is logical?
Because the people that voted for Victor didn't want to vote for Masters.Then why shouldn’t his early votes go to Masters?
So he admits he won the easy ones and lost the hard ones? I don't think candidates like Victora Spartz or Jim Banks were on the ropes without his endorsement.
FixyThe personality cult around our former president has tostop.[be replaced with personality cult around the new 'savior', DeSantis]
What 219 wins? Is he counting state government elections too?
Could be those are who winning so far so if it ends it would be 219…..? Who knows if that’s a legit Trump statement?What 219 wins? Is he counting state government elections too?
Seems to me this is an indictment of our ability to govern ourselves. That we hang on every ballot drop to see if another seat flips, that who wins the POTUS election, that we care who is nominated to SCOTUS tells us that too much power has been given to the federal government.Does anyone remember pregnant and hanging chads?
I remember us racing to use these electronic ballots. How everything comes full circle.
I think that depends on how many closet Liz Cheneys we end up withRepublicans did take back the house or so it seems. That means Bidens handlers won't be able to pass any more garbage laws.
I disagree. The ONLY explanation I can see for so many voting for a wreck like Fetterman is party über alles. The perceived need to keep Democrats in control despite how closely the US is circling the drainParty is irrelevant. How many occurred in this sort of economic and social climate?