^^^
You have clearly forgotten about the hordes of genetically engineered super-soldiers that the .gov has hidden underground.
I can name several Countries the Horde should be sent to...
^^^
You have clearly forgotten about the hordes of genetically engineered super-soldiers that the .gov has hidden underground.
Cash settlements eh? Ya hear that guys??
That case, which is now over a year old I believe, has very little to do with Indiana law. That was based on a case in NM, where OC is legal. State law is completely silent on OCing a handgun in that state, which is completely different than what Indiana law states.
That was based on a case in NM, where OC is legal. State law is completely silent on OCing a handgun in that state, which is completely different than what Indiana law states.
State law is silent on OCing in this state as well.
This isn't true.
Indiana state law is loud and clear on ANY (and all) carry: OC, CC, ABC, ETC.
So how come are we the only ones (the ones caught between the two sides) that have to play by the rules?!
(snipped)
If we, the gun community, support our LEOs, maybe we can get their support in return.
That case, which is now over a year old I believe, has very little to do with Indiana law. That was based on a case in NM, where OC is legal. State law is completely silent on OCing a handgun in that state, which is completely different than what Indiana law states.
It doesn't mention OC specifically. The difference is that in NM and some of the other states mentioned, no license or permit is required for OC, only for CC. Therefore, the LEO had no RAS or PC to question or detain anyone merely because they were openly carrying a handgun. In Indiana, however, it is a crime to carry unless one is a member of an exempted class, so an LEO would have PC to detain and question until he/she knew that the OCer was legal.
as soon as they all start defending the constitution then I will.
If we, the gun community, support our LEOs, maybe we can get their support in return.
That's not correct because it turns lawful OC into a "papers, please" activity. That wasnt the idea behind LTCH.
That's not correct because it turns lawful OC into a "papers, please" activity. That wasnt the idea behind LTCH.
Oh, it is correct.
Indiana legislators enacted code which made basically any handgun carry outside of your own property illegal unless you buy their "papers".
The idea behind it is also absolutely irrelevant at this point. The code remains.
Oh, it is correct.
Indiana legislators enacted code which made basically any handgun carry outside of your own property illegal unless you buy their "papers".
The idea behind it is also absolutely irrelevant at this point. The code remains.
NM code only made it illegal to conceal a handgun without buying their papers. Thus, NM citizens are less infringed than Hoosiers.
Only legislators (not cops) can fix this particular issue. Nobody else can change IC.
I was singled out and had my weapon taken from me. I would of been the only one if atfconsumer would of been more compliant.
I also have a form signed by chief of police of Indianapolis saying it is a rifle.
There is no permit required to do what I did.
But if a simple reading of the law doesnt end up where the legislature intended the courts have to give the law its most probable interpretation... The courts cant interpret the law so that the ruling is absurd...
Was the intent of the legislature in spite of the simple reading of the law to turn Indiana into a papers, please!! state for OC-ers???
I DONT THINK SO!!!