Apparently the Indiana Court of Appeals handed down an interesting decision yesterday.
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/08241602msm.pdf
It is being discussed on Guy Relford's FB page if you want more info, or to read more about it, etc
"Mere possession of a firearm, which is legal, cannot produce reasonable suspicion to justify a Terry stop. See Malone v. State, 882 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 49A02-1511-CR-2036 | August 24, 2016 Page 7 of 14 App. 2008) (evidence suppressed because possession of a handgun on a porch did not give officers sufficient evidence of criminal activity to justify stop), reh’g denied. The State has not directed us to a reason why the police believed when they stopped Pinner that his possession of the gun was illegal, nor has the State asserted any other criminal activity was 'afoot.' Accordingly, we are constrained to hold the stop of Pinner was not supported by reasonable suspicion."
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/08241602msm.pdf
It is being discussed on Guy Relford's FB page if you want more info, or to read more about it, etc