I'm all for the 1st amendment and free speech but.....
Oh so is the issue just that it is middle east themed? I thought maybe it was some evil terrorist that I just didn't recognize.
He never said he wanted to silence them.…but you’re really not, if seeing this makes you want to silence them…
Chances are VERY good that he’s Sikh, not Muslim, aka one of the good guys. And in the small chance he isn’t? Tough, this is what freedom of speech looks like.
Agreed. I don’t like joe bidet but I hate the f bidet flags…… just cause I have little kids. So I even agree with the message just dont Like it on display.He never said he wanted to silence them.
I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said something like "to have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."
I can absolutely be disgusted, appalled, and horrified by something, and think it is 100% wrong to do, but at the same time acknowledge that it is not the government's place to stop somebody from doing that thing, and that they have a right to do it under our laws.
(Disclaimer: I'm not actually saying that I'm disgusted, appalled, and horrified by the picture in OP's post; I'm really not sure what that decal supposed to convey.)
He never said he wanted to silence them.
I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said something like "to have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."
I can absolutely be disgusted, appalled, and horrified by something, and think it is 100% wrong to do, but at the same time acknowledge that it is not the government's place to stop somebody from doing that thing, and that they have a right to do it under our laws.
(Disclaimer: I'm not actually saying that I'm disgusted, appalled, and horrified by the picture in OP's post; I'm really not sure what that decal supposed to convey.)
Well, that’s pretty unambiguous.Meh.
I've got this sticker on the back of one of the trucks...
View attachment 240116
I have another of him humping a pig but don't have the pic.
Well, that’s pretty unambiguous.
I have to disagree with you. Not that I think your interpretation isn't possible, and it certainly could be the correct one, but I think it's a bit of an exaggeration to describe any other interpretation as "disingenuous."He VERY strongly implied it, and to say otherwise is being disingenuous. If it was only that he didn’t like the signs, he would have said such. But to say “I’m all for XYZ, but…” is commonly understood to mean that you actually aren’t “all for it,” but rather question XYZ, or only support it with certain modifiers applied (generally in your favor).