steveh_131
Grandmaster
hornadylnl said:But there's libertarians to argue with.
That does seem to be the favorite pastime around here lately, doesn't it?
hornadylnl said:But there's libertarians to argue with.
But there's libertarians to argue with.
Again, it has no bearing on the discussion since the officer himself admitted that the discussion was not about tactics (making Kirk Freeman flat wrong, as usual), but my curiosity has the best of me.
Nope. It is a tactical decision. He may have been joking about it but the B zone is a valid target.
Tastelessly joking about shooting this man who he then shot.
Out of curiosity, how many of you officers here regularly aim for the 'pecker' with your weapons?
Is this SOP, as the good barrister here would have us believe?
Again, it has no bearing on the discussion since the officer himself admitted that the discussion was not about tactics (making Kirk Freeman flat wrong, as usual), but my curiosity has the best of me.
I'm a little confuzzled by some of your high falootin' jargon.
B Zone =?
balls? nards? gonads?
Lots of people where shot for "illegally camping" in 1776. They were called Indians.
I am trying to think of a job that LEOs would be dictating how you do it.
It is not the point of my comment to pass judgment on what a family should or shouldn't do as a response to the abuse of authority by law enforcement.
I know. I'm just trying my hand at the art of deceptive straw man. I don't think I'm very good at it. I have neither the incapacity of logic nor the immorality of character to pull it off very well.He knows that.
I know. I'm just trying my hand at the art of deceptive straw man. I don't think I'm very good at it. I have neither the incapacity of logic nor the immorality of character to pull it off very well.