Guns in Post Office parking lots

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ModernGunner

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 29, 2010
    4,749
    63
    NWI
    Time to get the P.O. ban repealed, anyway.

    It's as stupid as any and every other 'gun free zone'.

    Sadly, that is highly likely to be 'proven' at some point. And sooner rather than later. :facepalm:

    1. Privatize USPS
    Chip, I presume you already know the USPS is private.
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    Does someone have a copy of the constitution that says "...shall not be infringed except in sensitive places"?

    I know, I know. Preaching to the choir, and all. Two solutions:

    1. Privatize USPS
    2. Indiana needs to expand its castle doctrine to include conveyance (as in, the right to be armed in one's vehicle, not merely the current SYG protection)

    As I understand it, SYG is already present *everywhere*, including schools, police stations, etc. You can't always be armed with a firearm, but you can always use force, including deadly force, if the use of that force is reasonable and necessary. That's a paraphrase of the law, going on memory, but accurate enough for the purpose of the discussion.

    Also, when the Heller decision came up for discussion at SCOTUS, we had Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas, and they had Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens and Souter. At that time, Anthony Kennedy was, w/r/t this decision, the most powerful man in the United States. Which way he went determined the fate of the 2A. Scalia had to write his opinion such that Kennedy would agree to it, or it would be not the majority but the dissenting opinion. You need to ask Mr. Kennedy your question about the Constitution. Were he not the swing vote, but a solid, strict Constitutionalist (as IMHO, they ALL should be!), Scalia could have written "The Second Amendment of the US Constitution very clearly states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and thus it is clear that no federal, state, or local law regarding firearms or ammunition is Constitutional. We therefore reverse the conviction of Mr. Heller, and invalidate any and all laws at all levels forbidding or otherwise controlling the ownership, possession, purchase, sale, carriage, or conveyance of firearms. Private businesses may still forbid if they choose, but without force of law."
    Pipe dream, I know, and that's not how SCOTUS works. The best we could have hoped for would have been what we got, minus the "sensitive places" section.

    Honestly, while I am pleased with the fact that Kennedy sided with the Constitutional argument, the necessity of that addition generates in me a desire to kick him in some sensitive places and then say, "Now, doncha wish you had the ability to defend yourself?" (To be clear for any FBI/Secret Service/NSA/ATF folks who may be reading, this is hyperbole, and I do not mean any threat to Justice Kennedy. Having a desire does not provide either method or opportunity, and I like it that way.)

    Blessings,
    Bill
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    Time to get the P.O. ban repealed, anyway.

    It's as stupid as any and every other 'gun free zone'.

    Sadly, that is highly likely to be 'proven' at some point. And sooner rather than later. :facepalm:

    Chip, I presume you already know the USPS is private.

    Privatized in the sense that it is not considered a federal entity/facility, "sensitive" or not.
     

    tcecil88

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 18, 2013
    2,054
    113
    @ the corner of IN, KY & OH.
    ^^ Dunno, never been in an "incident". If I was so worried about being in an "incident" that I felt the need to be armed 24/7/365 no matter what, I would never leave the house. I feel can survive 5 minutes in the P.O. without having a gun on me. YMMV.
     

    CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Growing up in small town Indiana, I didn't have a mail box per se. My mail box was a post office box, but the town was too small to have a post office. The post office was a small bank of PO boxes in the town grocery store. Did the fact that the grocery store owner was also the town Postmaster make the whole store a federal no-go zone for otherwise law-abiding firearm carriers?
     

    rosefarm10

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 4, 2015
    54
    8
    Milford
    I adore Indiana. You have reciprocity laws that allow Illinois folk to carry in your state. The post office scenario is identical in Illinois. Our local office has a large public parking lot to park the car and the gun. I have the Illinois laws ingrained in my head. Indiana is SO much better!
     
    Top Bottom